Does Anyone Remember Hans + Lotte Hass..
ChatterBank5 mins ago
No best answer has yet been selected by 10ClarionSt. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.As previously stated you should have been the registered owner since purchase. What will have changed at the Land Registry is that the lender's Charge should have been removed. If you want to check whether this is the case you can get a copy of land registry records. See the Land Registry website for details:-
Despite all the above, if I were you I would make sure the Deeds are kept very safely. It is quite possible that they may contain documents that are relevant to the property but not on the Land Registry record (for example, planning or building regulation consents) which could be needed when you come to sell. Also, particularly if the house is old, the Deeds might be useful if there was ever a boundary dispute as the Land Registry plan is often small scale and can be unclear about precise boundary location. However, it could be that all you have got is the Land Registry Land Certificate document, in which case the above does not apply but - in my view - it is still very worthwhile ensuring you keep it safe. After all, mistakes have been known to occur, even in the best controlled computer systems, and having your own evidence of ownership would make it far easier to correct if one occurred.
You say you've got nothing that says the house is yours but you should have the Land Certificate. Section A - Property Register - should give the address of your house, and Section B - Proprietorship Register - should give your name as owner. If you haven't got this, query it with your mortgage lender.