Created another thread on this in error. Apologies .
Again, for my understanding: Is it now the case that, were she to recover her mental faculties, the guilty verdict could actually be passed?
Does anyone know if she ever repaid any of the money that was fiddled? She flipped homes and carried out home improvements at the taxpayers expense, so were she to sell any of these properties at a profit, do the taxpayers get a proportion of that?
This does seem eerily reminiscent of what happened with Ernest Saunders, as I think Sandy alluded to in an earlier post.