Home & Garden3 mins ago
making a will yourself
40 Answers
For a straightforward will has anyone used a DIY kit or online site which is recommendable please ? Thankyou
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by answerbanker. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Blood relatives do not automatically have any claim on an estate, except in cases of intestacy. When a second-cousin twice removed of mine died intestate, my father stepped in, and about ten cousins came out of the woodwork. Each cousin got an equal share eventually. But, if there is a valid will, only those people mentioned as beneficiaries will get anything. Relatives who are left out can only claim if they have been dependants of the dead person. Able-bodied adults, say an estranged brother, cannot dispute a will just because they weren't mentioned, and thought they should have been mentioned.
By the way, the biggest fattest textbook on wills was written by Lord Jarman. And, guess what ? He had his own will contested in court.
Lawyers !!!
By the way, the biggest fattest textbook on wills was written by Lord Jarman. And, guess what ? He had his own will contested in court.
Lawyers !!!
We have written a number ..maybe 10.. of straightforward wills for friends and family. The four which have needed to be executed have gone through probate and been executed with absolutely no problem. We used a template which we obtained online.
If you are of average intelligence and the will you are writing is uncomplicated, and you follow some guidelines which are readily available either online or from the library, then I would save yourself a few bob and do it yourself.
If you're not confident or your will is not straightforward then I would seek legal advice.
Just my opinion for what it's worth.
If you are of average intelligence and the will you are writing is uncomplicated, and you follow some guidelines which are readily available either online or from the library, then I would save yourself a few bob and do it yourself.
If you're not confident or your will is not straightforward then I would seek legal advice.
Just my opinion for what it's worth.
answerbanker, these people do it for £30 for one will or £40 for two. I used them myself.
http ://w ww.b enef icen tlaw .co. uk/m ake- a-wi ll.h tml
Regarding barmaid's question, I suspect Dave's observation might be right.
Also, I believe that unless distant relatives were reliant on the deceased for their upkeep then they are not entitled to claim anything.
And you don't have to be an executor to be a beneficiary as I think someone has claimed.
I am scratching my head at LyndaB's post. Can that really be so?
Come on BM, put us out of our misery.
http
Regarding barmaid's question, I suspect Dave's observation might be right.
Also, I believe that unless distant relatives were reliant on the deceased for their upkeep then they are not entitled to claim anything.
And you don't have to be an executor to be a beneficiary as I think someone has claimed.
I am scratching my head at LyndaB's post. Can that really be so?
Come on BM, put us out of our misery.
Can I also ask, if you can put in your will what care you would like when you're old. If someone has Alzheimer's when they're old they don't necessarily know what's good for them, and I would like to give my children official permission to decide about my care, and put me in a home if needed (as I might disagree with them if I get senile), but I know they will know what's best for me.Sorry to ask this on your thread, Answerbanker.
Thank you. I'm 50 now, is it ok to arrange it soon? And how will I remember to give it to them if I become senile? My Mum got Alzheimers and was SO miserable in her bungalow, we knew she would be happy in a home, but she wouldn't go into one. We eventually got her into a home for the last 18 months of her life, and she liked it (as we knew she would). My sister had power of attorney, but I understood that was for her finances. We didn't have the authority to make decisions about putting her in a home.
You don't wait until you are senile.
They will know about it anyway - they have to sign the forms.
If you are worried about it then include a clause to say it doesn't come into effect until you have become incapable. But giving them the right to make decisions doesn't prevent you making your own, and whilst you are capable your own views would take priority.
They will know about it anyway - they have to sign the forms.
If you are worried about it then include a clause to say it doesn't come into effect until you have become incapable. But giving them the right to make decisions doesn't prevent you making your own, and whilst you are capable your own views would take priority.
The will mentioned in LyndaB's post was perfectly valid assuming everything else about it was OK - possibly the solicitor (or her friend) oversimplified the explanation
It is open to challenge though - and the challenge is slightly more likely to be upheld if there is no mention of the son in the will than if he is mentioned and excluded or given a token bequest
It is open to challenge though - and the challenge is slightly more likely to be upheld if there is no mention of the son in the will than if he is mentioned and excluded or given a token bequest
Sorry, I completely forgot. The "will" I drafted is in many ways imperfect, but the biggest issue is that it would not pass any real property such as a house or land. That would go under the intestacy rules.
Can I also correct a very common suggestion that in order to claim under the Inheritance (Provision for family and Dependants) Act 1975, a claimant does NOT have to prove dependency. That is one of the people who can claim. The others are spouse (or civil partner), former spouse or civil partner who has not remarried, child, person treated as a child of the deceased under a marriage/civil partnership to which the deceased was a party and someone who has been co-habiting with the deceased as husband/wife in the two years immediately before the death of the deceased.
I have no idea why the Will that LyndaB mentioned was invalid because as dzug says, that in itself is not enough to invalidate a Will. It was potentially invalid for lack of testamentary capacity - one of the tests for TC is that the testatrix must consider the claims to which she ought to give effect.
Can I also correct a very common suggestion that in order to claim under the Inheritance (Provision for family and Dependants) Act 1975, a claimant does NOT have to prove dependency. That is one of the people who can claim. The others are spouse (or civil partner), former spouse or civil partner who has not remarried, child, person treated as a child of the deceased under a marriage/civil partnership to which the deceased was a party and someone who has been co-habiting with the deceased as husband/wife in the two years immediately before the death of the deceased.
I have no idea why the Will that LyndaB mentioned was invalid because as dzug says, that in itself is not enough to invalidate a Will. It was potentially invalid for lack of testamentary capacity - one of the tests for TC is that the testatrix must consider the claims to which she ought to give effect.
It might help in respect of a challenge to the Will on the grounds of lack of capacity to show that the testatrix had considered her wider family and concluded not to leave them anything but that's the only value it has. A good will draftsman will include a detailed attendance note in the file dealing with these things.