Oooh My Christmas Present Just Came
ChatterBank1 min ago
No best answer has yet been selected by REWD. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I read somewhere that they also had look up tables - on the URL given, Dr Math doesnt mention this.
so that for 25 x 25 which I think is 625
XXV times XXV a table would give you x times xxv, so you add that twice to whatever the look up says v times xxv is.
This effectively converts multiplication to addition.
Roman number system was bi-quinary
five time I is V,
twice V is X
five times X is L
twice L is C
five times C is D and twice D is M
but it is not really place ordered. so IX is one minus ten, where as in our system 565 can never mean takes 5 from 6 under any circs.
so multiplying IX by MCM, perhaps they really did look up X times MCM and take away MCM......
Anyway I now see why algebra (arabic derivation) awaited the more 'obvious' arabic number system......
Roman numerals and calculations were complicated by the lack of a symbol for 'zero', which only appeared from about 1,000 AD.
I had far too much to drink last night to give a full explanation of roman mathematics, maybe this will help, while I pop off for an Alker seltzer: http://www.legionxxiv.org/numerals/