Shopping & Style6 mins ago
When Can We Expect Mary Miller To Be Unfit To Defend Herself About £90.000 Expenses.
Yet another MP claiming £90,000 expenses whilst spending time in her parents house. Mary Miller the culture secretary is playing the system , all legal and above board she claims.
Margaret Moran who ripped off the taxpayer for £53,00 has now used a doctor to avoid prosecution , after a jury had found her guilty.
I bet Mary Miller will pull the same stunt if she is ever prosecuted.
In the past couple of years criminals have been playing the same game and make a rapid recovery when the risk of prosecution is past.
Margaret Moran who ripped off the taxpayer for £53,00 has now used a doctor to avoid prosecution , after a jury had found her guilty.
I bet Mary Miller will pull the same stunt if she is ever prosecuted.
In the past couple of years criminals have been playing the same game and make a rapid recovery when the risk of prosecution is past.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by modeller. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Is it only doctors from The Priory who will be believed by a court or could we penniless plebs have a go at convincing an NHS operative of how depressed we are and take them along to plead our case.
As ever it seems that falling foul of the law for those with power and privilege is completely different than for mere mortals.
She's a thief.
As ever it seems that falling foul of the law for those with power and privilege is completely different than for mere mortals.
She's a thief.
Yes, corby. We can find suitably qualified doctors (at least one must be qualified in psychiatric medicine) by shopping around; you are bound to find two who think the right thing. But when the prosecution's man agrees with them, that's a gift, and pretty good evidence that the defendant is unfit.
Though I still think she was fortunate. I never understood the principle. I get that someone who is insane at the time of the act should not be treated as one who is. But someone who suffers a bout of depression after the crime and after being arrested and charged is never brought back for trial when they recover. They are dealt with finally as this woman was.
Though I still think she was fortunate. I never understood the principle. I get that someone who is insane at the time of the act should not be treated as one who is. But someone who suffers a bout of depression after the crime and after being arrested and charged is never brought back for trial when they recover. They are dealt with finally as this woman was.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.