Quizzes & Puzzles29 mins ago
Plebgate - The Poluce Made It All Up.
Turns out the 'eyewitness' wasn't there and was in fact not even on duty at the time. He has been charged.
You've got to laugh.
http:// www.tel egraph. co.uk/n ews/pol itics/c onserva tive/97 53261/N ew-foot age-of- Mitchel l-plebg ate-spa t-emerg es.html
You've got to laugh.
http://
Answers
If there does turn out to be a conspiracy, this could be the first and only time the media will get to refer to something as Gategate.
22:31 Tue 18th Dec 2012
// No 10 calls for urgent investigation into allegation that serving officer fabricated evidence against former chief whip //
http:// www.gua rdian.c o.uk/po litics/ 2012/de c/18/an drew-mi tchell- pleb-me t-polic e
http://
FredPuli42
Not sure that is true Fred. The CCTV and the testomony of the two officers varies. They say in the official police log leaked to the Daily Telegraph that the incident was witnessed by several members of the public who were shocked. The CCTV shows no gathering of witnesses. That undermines the rest of their account.
Not sure that is true Fred. The CCTV and the testomony of the two officers varies. They say in the official police log leaked to the Daily Telegraph that the incident was witnessed by several members of the public who were shocked. The CCTV shows no gathering of witnesses. That undermines the rest of their account.
there is footage from the time that Mitchell wheeled his bicycle out of the gates of No 10, you cannot tell what is being said obviously, but given the time span it seems quite unlikely that he would have had all that time to mouth off not just so many expletives, but the rest of the so called diatribe. He is seen cycling off into the distance, and there does not seem from the footage to be anyone else around. It was shown any number of times last evening on channel 4.
// I would never believe a word Plod say unless there was other evidence to back it up. //
Neither would I necessarily. The reason I was convinced it had to be Mitchell who was lying was quite simply because the police had absolutely nothing to gain from making up his rant. Nothing whatsoever.
Conversely, Mitchell would have had good reason to deny it if their version was true.
I see another man has since been arrested...
http:// www.bbc .co.uk/ news/uk -politi cs-2079 5489
Neither would I necessarily. The reason I was convinced it had to be Mitchell who was lying was quite simply because the police had absolutely nothing to gain from making up his rant. Nothing whatsoever.
Conversely, Mitchell would have had good reason to deny it if their version was true.
I see another man has since been arrested...
http://
Lot of fuss about not much. Someone lost their rag it seems. Not a good example but we all have bad days. Disagreement on the exact insult hurled ? Who should care ? No one uses the definition of plebeian, or gets overly uptight about the word pleb these days. It's a mild put down as one might use when arguing with someone. Mitchell should have been reprimanded for his behaviour unbecoming an MP. It's up to him and his party whether he resigned. As to what insults were hurled according to the police account, that is irrelevant. Regardless who gives the more accurate account. All concerned should move on and stop milking being in the public eye.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.