Rigth Or Wrong ?

[youngmafbog]

Legalize sex at 14? Personally I consider it a bad thing. Lowering the age then makes younger ( < 14) people think it will be ok as they are 'nearly 14'

Campaigners claim they are not able to discuss birth control etc, but what tosh.

As for legalizing nudity, Seems ok to me so long as there is a law against ugly sights on display (yep, including me!)

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/4738306/teenagers-should-be-able-to-have-sex-at-14.html

[emmie]

bad idea, isn't it already the case that doctors can prescribe the pill to young underage girls without the parents consent. Will have to look that bit up, but sure i read that quite recently, to do with the sexual health of the girl over the wishes of the parents.

[nannybooby]

Personally I think sixteen is about right. Parents need to discuss these issues with thier offspring and not leave it to others. Birth control is only one issue , there are so many more not least the reasons why they want sex , cant all be raging hormones and true love. You are rsponsible for helping your child make the right choices.

[BRIGHT SPARK]

Are they trying to get a certain man with long blonde hair and jewellery off the hook?

[ummmm]

Doubtful.

[NOX]

Personally I think both suggestions are a good idea. I have no objection to nudists and it concerns me that the present law criminalises young people of 14 for having sex. The age of consent in the UK is reasonably high compared to a lot of places in Europe and I have to say I haven't noticed Germany, where my daughter lives a lot of the time, falling into pieces because their age of consent is 14. Parents have an obligation to instill in their sons and daughters an ability to value themselves and to be confident and self determining, some people will be ready to have sex at 14 others not really mature enough at 20, but I think to criminalise young people is wrong.
Nudists are just funny, not sexual, so no harm done.