ChatterBank3 mins ago
Listener 4227: 42 By Xanthippe
59 Answers
Well, that was quite a workout!! Scant help from the preamble made for tricky end-game even after sussing what the 42 were. Not a subject I know anything about so cannot comment on the specific accuracy or plausibility of the final manoeuvres. Some foxy clueing, too. Definitely feel like I deserve a drink but, alas, today is 1st of Feb and Feb is my dry month....Many thanks to Xanthippe for another hard test.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by trux. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.All done and dusted in an afternoon and evening - although I took rather longer than necessary looking for the final pair ... word blindness I think (or possibly the glass or two of red).
Tough clueing I thought, but all ultimately parsable, a neat (although seen before?) theme and it all fits very nicely together at the end.
Thanks Xanthippe.
Tough clueing I thought, but all ultimately parsable, a neat (although seen before?) theme and it all fits very nicely together at the end.
Thanks Xanthippe.
Having just sent my entry off, I had the very last PDM, which made me chuckle. Alekhine - I'm hoping it can't matter in this case (in fact, arguably, in one of the recent Listeners an accent arguably became necessary as a result of the endgame, but on balance, I thought the preamble did not require it to be inserted. Am hoping I'm not wrong).
@Contendo - the quarter-finals have started rather than the semis. Not sure when exactly my next appearance(s - there will be at least two due to the way the competition works) will be but it's going to be either the 18th or 25th of February, I presume.
I'm hoping the cedilla doesn't matter -- indeed I didn't even realise this puzzle had one anywhere until about two minutes ago!
I'm hoping the cedilla doesn't matter -- indeed I didn't even realise this puzzle had one anywhere until about two minutes ago!
Incidentally on the wordplay/definition/wordplay issue - which is curious - might it be that the setter originally came up with definition/wordplay (i.e., without the first wordplay) - which would itself be a delightful clue (I think) but which, in itself, has an alternative and equally valid solution? Just a thought.
Yes, olichant, that's possible (and in fact the alternative solution was the one which I first came up with). But in that case the original wordplay, elegant though it was, should surely have been dropped. The result would have been a conventionally-structured clue which is unambiguous, albeit not as misleading as the setter's first version.
I found the latter stages of this a bit of a slog. Remembered the theme from a few years ago and wasn't difficult to work out the highlighting so thereafter the final few entries became rather laborious with no further treats in sight. Some jolly fine clueing though.
Ou est le cedilla? Je n'ai pas le trouve
Ou est le cedilla? Je n'ai pas le trouve
Late starter this week; 50 minutes to go before 4228, and I stagger there over the last wordplay......a lovely, mind-twisting puzzle. I am afraid I didn't even notice the wordplay/def/wordplay clue till checking at the end. Really enjoyed every minute of this, Xanthippe. Even after the denoument - no accent there, and I omitted the cedilla in the entry - there was some lovely reminiscent-of-numerical logical working out to be done.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.