Depends what scale you use, if you count atoms or if you count threads. Nature's full of extra-ordinary conceptual comparisons that seem to defy logic, however if the research paper you read was credible, one must assume accurate measurements were taken and reasonable conclusions were drawn from averaging the data, allowing the author to invert the microscopic scale of root filaments, into an incedible sounding 5km Charity Fun Run length.
My favourite fact about plants is the wrong assumption that they grow from the ground. All the materials they use to build their form is captured from the air :)