Both the police and the courts MUST provide bail unless there is a specific reason not to (e.g. it seems likely that the accused person would commit further offences while on bail, or that he might interfere with witnesses). So the police would only seek to reverse that action if their investigations showed that one of the reasons for refusing bail had come into play.
It's normal not to hear anything while on bail, and nothing should be read into it either way. However your solicitor might be told, just before you're next due to attend the police station, what will happen when you arrive. For example, if he's told that you'll simply be re-bailed until a later date, he'd probably decide that it was unnecessary for him to attend. Similarly, if it was made clear that you'd be charged and then re-bailed (without any further questioning) he'd probably also see no point in his attendance. (He'd only attend if you were to be questioned again or if the police notified him that they would be refusing further bail or imposing additional bail restrictions; he could then seek to challenge those decisions).
Chris