ChatterBank1 min ago
Biology
Answers
No best answer has yet been selected by potterfan3. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.In physics, if you shine a ray of light through a prism it will be refracted in a particular way and every time it is repeated, the light will do exactly the same thing. Furthermore, laws can be derived that enable accurate predictions of what will happen when light passes through a different prism.
In chemistry, the same can be said about how molecules and atoms interact.
In biology, animals do not behave in such rigidly predictable ways and much of biology uses statistacal analysis to make predictions. That does not stop it being a science. Scientific methods are applied to investigations. Furthermore, there is quite an overlap between many branches of biology and both chemistry and physics.
He's probably just upset about what Ernest Rutherford (the "discoverer of the atom" ) said about chemistry
He said "all science is either physics or stamp collecting"
Or maybe he's upset about what Pauli (Another great Physicist and Nobel prize winner) said
On learning his wife had left him he said "If she'd left me for a bullfighter I would have understood..but for a Chemist!!???"
I guess chemists pick on Biologists, Physicists pick on Chemists - Perhaps Mathematicians pick on physcists - but nobody can understand a word they say so we'll probably never know! :c)
Well now, the teacher could mean this in a couple of ways
as jake suggests, a reductionist view of science is that biology is basically chemistry applied to living organisms. The chemistry teacher may be joking that biology is just a sub-branch of chemistry.
He may be a creationist and disagree with the values of evolutionary biology.
either way he is wrong.
jim