ChatterBank3 mins ago
Why Was This Savage Out On The Streets?
http:// www.bbc .co.uk/ news/uk -englan d-londo n-22183 589
He'd done it before, why was he even at liberty?
"Jaji was sentenced to a 10-month detention and training order but was not registered as a sex offender. ", words fail me. I'm just gutted for the latest victim and her family.
He'd done it before, why was he even at liberty?
"Jaji was sentenced to a 10-month detention and training order but was not registered as a sex offender. ", words fail me. I'm just gutted for the latest victim and her family.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Titehead. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I wasn't specifically referring to your comment.
I don't know enough about the first case - Sexual assault can cover a very wide range of actions
I do think that the second case however then displayed a pattern and that was the point where things definitely went wrong
I do think that there's a case for re-examining whether child pornography cases should be handled by magistrates
I don't know enough about the first case - Sexual assault can cover a very wide range of actions
I do think that the second case however then displayed a pattern and that was the point where things definitely went wrong
I do think that there's a case for re-examining whether child pornography cases should be handled by magistrates
Ah ok.
I believe the previous conviction concerned an appalling sexual assault and robbery of a female child and served only five months detention and a training order which he later breached and was fined £15. He still remained in the community despite having been further convicted of MAKING indecent pictures of young girls. There does not seem to be info available at this time regarding a rape and another attempted rape which has been left to lie on file.
Its not just jurisdiction that needs to be looked into as we often see pathetic sentences handed out also by the Crown courts.
I believe the previous conviction concerned an appalling sexual assault and robbery of a female child and served only five months detention and a training order which he later breached and was fined £15. He still remained in the community despite having been further convicted of MAKING indecent pictures of young girls. There does not seem to be info available at this time regarding a rape and another attempted rape which has been left to lie on file.
Its not just jurisdiction that needs to be looked into as we often see pathetic sentences handed out also by the Crown courts.
// : i'm intrigued Gromit - how do you know that Titehead , DangerUXB and R1 Geezer are the same ? //
// Youngmafbog : Gromit, what do you have against R1, why do you assume anyone taking up a stance is R1. Is it you getting them banned becasue you are unable to formulate an argument against them so the best way is to shut them up by getting them banned. //
For the record, I have never complained about, reported, got banned or grassed on RG1. He seems to get himself banned by not obeying the same rules as the rest follow.
Personally, I would re-instate R1G but ban the posts when he obviously is inebriated and abusive. I would make him a special case because, like AOG, I tend to mostly disagree with his posts, but he does add something to this site.
Here is a timeline of R1Gs aliases. I have probably missed some out, but this is how we get to Titehead if anyone is interested.
R1Geezer Suspended: Sun 21st Aug 2011
Kayles joined: Fri 21st Oct 2011
Kayles Suspended: 12th Dec 2011
d9f1c7 Joined: Fri 06th Jan 2012
D9f1c7 suspended: Thu 14th Jun 2012
Thatcherite joined: :Wed 26th Sep 2012
Thatcherite Suspended :Wed 24th Oct 2012
KerrAvon joined: 25th Oct 2012
KerrAvon Suspended: 14th Nov 2012
RedGrant Joined: Fri 16th Nov 2012
RedGrant Suspended: 22nd Nov 2012
DangerUXD joined: 14th Jan 2013
DangerUXD Suspended: 12th Apr 2013
Titehead joined 15:28 Mon 15th Apr 2013
A recent communique from the ABEditor to moderators: R1Geezer - I've not spotted him transforming into the bile gland of Jeremy Clarkson recently, so I am unaware as to whether he's a member at the mo. Give him a push into the abyss if you spot him though.
// Youngmafbog : Gromit, what do you have against R1, why do you assume anyone taking up a stance is R1. Is it you getting them banned becasue you are unable to formulate an argument against them so the best way is to shut them up by getting them banned. //
For the record, I have never complained about, reported, got banned or grassed on RG1. He seems to get himself banned by not obeying the same rules as the rest follow.
Personally, I would re-instate R1G but ban the posts when he obviously is inebriated and abusive. I would make him a special case because, like AOG, I tend to mostly disagree with his posts, but he does add something to this site.
Here is a timeline of R1Gs aliases. I have probably missed some out, but this is how we get to Titehead if anyone is interested.
R1Geezer Suspended: Sun 21st Aug 2011
Kayles joined: Fri 21st Oct 2011
Kayles Suspended: 12th Dec 2011
d9f1c7 Joined: Fri 06th Jan 2012
D9f1c7 suspended: Thu 14th Jun 2012
Thatcherite joined: :Wed 26th Sep 2012
Thatcherite Suspended :Wed 24th Oct 2012
KerrAvon joined: 25th Oct 2012
KerrAvon Suspended: 14th Nov 2012
RedGrant Joined: Fri 16th Nov 2012
RedGrant Suspended: 22nd Nov 2012
DangerUXD joined: 14th Jan 2013
DangerUXD Suspended: 12th Apr 2013
Titehead joined 15:28 Mon 15th Apr 2013
A recent communique from the ABEditor to moderators: R1Geezer - I've not spotted him transforming into the bile gland of Jeremy Clarkson recently, so I am unaware as to whether he's a member at the mo. Give him a push into the abyss if you spot him though.
i too wondered at the lenient sentence handed down first time, was watching this on the news last evening and couldn't get the thought out of my head that had the law done it's job for the first crime, he may not have been out to do this. It's second guessing, but when you hear what he did to the second young lass i can't help thinking what will the girl and the parents be going through and wonder at the justice system for letting this predator walk free. Not even on the sex offenders register.. vile
/// I would make him a special case because, like AOG, I tend to mostly disagree with his posts, but he does add something to this site. ///
I wondered when I would get a mention, but I thought it would have been somehow woven into this savage's actions simply because he happened to be black.
I often get accused of being racist if I dare to report on such cases, but then the usual suspects seem to be noticeable by their absence on this one, for some strange reason.
I wondered when I would get a mention, but I thought it would have been somehow woven into this savage's actions simply because he happened to be black.
I often get accused of being racist if I dare to report on such cases, but then the usual suspects seem to be noticeable by their absence on this one, for some strange reason.
I wondered when I would get a mention, but I thought it would have been somehow woven into this savage's actions simply because he happened to be black.
I often get accused of being racist if I dare to report on such cases, but then the usual suspects seem to be noticeable by their absence on this one, for some strange reason.
No - you know why you get accused of being a racist. It's because you will highlight cases like these when the suspect is black, but will ignore very similar cases where the suspect is white.
Also, you have stated that you would not hire Nigerians, because of your admitted prejudices.
And you have stated that black people aren't shown to be villains enough in films and television programmes.
And you post a link to a story about Joss Stone for no other reason but to highlight that the suspects were black.
That's why people accuse you of being a racist.
Not saying that they are necessarily right...just pointing out things you might not realise about your posts.
I often get accused of being racist if I dare to report on such cases, but then the usual suspects seem to be noticeable by their absence on this one, for some strange reason.
No - you know why you get accused of being a racist. It's because you will highlight cases like these when the suspect is black, but will ignore very similar cases where the suspect is white.
Also, you have stated that you would not hire Nigerians, because of your admitted prejudices.
And you have stated that black people aren't shown to be villains enough in films and television programmes.
And you post a link to a story about Joss Stone for no other reason but to highlight that the suspects were black.
That's why people accuse you of being a racist.
Not saying that they are necessarily right...just pointing out things you might not realise about your posts.
I remembered a few more R1G aliases...
CanisMajor Suspended: 24 August 2011
MoonRocker Joined: Sun 17th Jun 2012
MoonRocker Suspended: Mon 06th Aug 2012
PetitAnglais Joined: Sat 05th Jan 2013
PetitAnglais Suspended: Fri 11th Jan 2013
Then there was this poor chap enquiring about his release date
http:// www.the answerb ank.co. uk/Chat terBank /Questi on11737 66.html
I am wondering if youngmafbog is also a R1G alias? If you search keywords on here like 'Oooman' 'Noo Labour' 'Septics' you mostly get R1G and YMF answers
CanisMajor Suspended: 24 August 2011
MoonRocker Joined: Sun 17th Jun 2012
MoonRocker Suspended: Mon 06th Aug 2012
PetitAnglais Joined: Sat 05th Jan 2013
PetitAnglais Suspended: Fri 11th Jan 2013
Then there was this poor chap enquiring about his release date
http://
I am wondering if youngmafbog is also a R1G alias? If you search keywords on here like 'Oooman' 'Noo Labour' 'Septics' you mostly get R1G and YMF answers