The Policeman in this case said "Those who should have been caring him for him ultimately caused his untimely and tragic death."
This would appear to another case of a lack of action by the relevant authorities. If this little boy had been taken into care, he would still be alive today.
only fairly recently have I changed my view re drug addicted parents being allowed to keep children with supervision by social work...... if any adult who is responsible for a child continues to use drugs the child should be removed immediately and put into foster care,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,i can only go by my experience of foster carers in my area, and there are...
Read the article :::Wolverhampton Safeguarding Children Board, which includes the city council's children's services department, is currently holding a serious case review into the circumstances surrounding Daniel's death.
Yet another Council shutting the door after the horse has bolted, Just like the Phillpots and all those girls that were "in care" but still managed get abused time after time after time. What were the health visitors doing when they made their regular checks...he was only 23 months when he died.
From what I have read the little boy was exposed to varying amounts of numerous illegal drugs since his birth, evidence of chronic exposure to opiates and cannabis was found by analysing his hair, there were also significant traces of amphetamine and cocaine. The child was known to social services but was allowed to live in the home of two addicts without close supervision. There are questions requiring answers in my opinion!
daffy...you can sure that those questions WILL be answered, just like the other cases but only after this little lad is dead, and no official heads will roll, in any department.
But hc4361, these parents couldn't care for themselves, let alone a toddler.
Trouble is, blaming the parents, who, of course are guilty, won't stop the next child from being abused and possible killed under the noses of the Authorities will it ? This will be all over the papers tomorrow with cries of indignation, and next week it will all be forgotten about until the next time.
What a tragic waste of a little life. Seeing this families history, it would seem that he should have been taken into care straight from the maternity ward.
I'm sorry but these cases with children involved really upset me. I actually cried last summer when I watched the news the night that the Phillpots kids died.
What really gets up my goat are the platitudes that are spouted after these cases, 'lessons will be learnt', ATF, it happens again and again. I know we only ever hear about cases when they've gone pear shaped but come on!
I totally see your point HC and the parents should be the no1, but the authorities are supposed to be there to step in when scum are threatening children. And in this case they did not, so they must share the blame.
We don't know the facts. I have seen nothing that says the authorities were involved with this family and of course the Wolverhampton Safeguarding Children Board is now involved, if they weren't before.
Do you propose all babies and children should be removed from the parents if they have drug problems? If so, what degree of problem? Should pregnant women be screened for drugs and forced to have an abortion?
How about single mum gets involved with druggie man - when should the children be removed?
'Taken in to care' is not some magic wand that takes the children to some sort of Disney world. Forcibly removing a child is traumatic for the child; growing up in care is not ideal - look at all the sex abuse victims who were in care when they were targeted.
No matter how bad we perceive a parent to be, most children love their parents very much and there is no crystal ball for social workers. Some druggie parents do manage to raise their children, hold down a job and have the coping strategies needed. There are many thousands of children living with drug addict parents.
It is completely heartbreaking. But it must be so hard to decide which children get taken into care and which don't. Sometimes the authorities can't win either way.
only fairly recently have I changed my view re drug addicted parents being allowed to keep children with supervision by social work...... if any adult who is responsible for a child continues to use drugs the child should be removed immediately and put into foster care,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,i can only go by my experience of foster carers in my area, and there are just not enough .
Drug addicts should not be allowed to have children, nor should they receive benefits, if necessary they should be sterilized. They chose to take the drug in the first place, they should face the consequences.
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.