News0 min ago
Critics Of Same Sex Marriage To Get Protection
7 Answers
http:// www.dai lymail. co.uk/n ews/art icle-23 42893/N ew-law- protect -gay-ma rriage- critics -Act-he lp-beli eve-mar riage-m an-woma n.html
Wouldn't this just amount to legalisation of bigotry?
Wouldn't this just amount to legalisation of bigotry?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by mushroom25. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.The perceived necessity for such a law says much about the way in which we have allowed so-called political correctness to rule us. Free speech is only free speech if the law deems it to be free speech – and by giving it to one, we take it from another – and then upon objection from the loser, change our minds and decide that he must also be afforded the right to freedom of speech. Potty! We are climbing up our own bottoms!
It seems a slightly odd proposal for this legal amendment to me. Objectors to gay marriage are already perfectly at liberty to say so, without fear of legal action - unless of course by their comments they are inciting violence etc....
I wonder if it is supposed to protect people like registrars in registry offices who do not wish to perform a gay marriage ceremony because it goes against their beliefs? Or perhaps to protect against dismissal for making anti-gay marriage comments, as seemingly happened in this recent case?
http:// www.ins idehous ing.co. uk/hous ing-man ager-wi ns-gay- marriag e-remar ks-case /652468 9.artic le
But again, no additional legal protections are required - the current legislation was more than adequate in this case too...
I wonder if it is supposed to protect people like registrars in registry offices who do not wish to perform a gay marriage ceremony because it goes against their beliefs? Or perhaps to protect against dismissal for making anti-gay marriage comments, as seemingly happened in this recent case?
http://
But again, no additional legal protections are required - the current legislation was more than adequate in this case too...
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.