Donate SIGN UP

Ethiopian Airways Dreamliner

Avatar Image
mikey4444 | 07:48 Sat 13th Jul 2013 | News
40 Answers
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-23298349

I am a bit confused here. How can a country like Ethiopia possibly afford to buy an extremely expensive airliner, when its population is constantly moving from one humanitarian crisis to another ?
Gravatar

Answers

21 to 40 of 40rss feed

First Previous 1 2

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by mikey4444. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
mushroom.....of course...thanks.

Somalia/Ethiopia....same place to me...;-)
A friend of mine went to Ethiopia last November and it`s actually a very interesting country to visit (my sister`s going there later this year, flying Ethiopian Airliines). My friend said that the people she met felt that due to the coverage of the past famine and trouble, their country doesn`t get fair portrayal overseas as it was a relatively small percentage that were affected. I don`t know anything about Ethiopian Airlines but a lot of airlines lease their aircraft, they don`t buy them. The new generation of aircraft are actually cheaper to run (due to weight and fuel economy) so it makes sense to update the fleet. It would help if they didn`t keep catching fire though :-)
Ah!....237SJ.....didn't know that.

Thanks.
Agriculture is very Labour intensive, so I imagine the wealth does trickle down.

Exports of Fruit, vegetables and flowers will mainly be by air, so a national airline to do that makes sense.
Somalia, Sqad. You may know it as British Somaliland. You remember, next to Abyssinia?
In many African states you have a few very very REALLY rich people, and the rest are very very poor.

The rich ones line their own pockets, and own all the large companies, leaving the mass of the population to starve.

In Pakistan for example (I know it is not in Africa) very few people pay tax (even the MPs and prime minister) so the money is not "spread around" the whole population, leaving many very poor people. And we give aid to Pakistan !

India has more millionaires than the UK, but again few pay tax and money is not shared around, leaving millions very poor. India has their own space program, but again we give aid to India.

This is why when Asians come here from Pakistan and India they do all they can to avoid paying tax (as they don't in their own country) and the idea that they can be given money by the state (child benefit) to have more children amazes them, hence their over breeding.
UK breeding statistics.

The Office of National Statistics says the local authorities with the three highest percentages of families with three or more dependent children (Tower Hamlets, Newham and Birmingham) are also local authorities with high percentages of people of Pakistani or Bangladeshi ethnicity. For example in Tower Hamlets, a third of people had Pakistani or Bangladeshi ethnicity – the highest percentage of all local authorities in England and Wales. For comparison, across England and Wales, 3 per cent of people had Bangladeshi or Pakistani ethnicity.
@VHG

add most of africa to that as well
VHG - very few people pay tax, wrong, very few people pay DIRECT tax. These economies are mainly indirect tax as we where a couple of centuries ago.
VHG

Income Tax was introduced to raise money for the Napoleonic Wars. But the Government got used to it and have been taking money off of us ever since. Paying income tax is not that great a system, hard to collect, unfair, easily avoided.

The fact that some countries do not do income tax is not necessarily a bad thing.
UK ageing statistics.

Over the next 5 years, 3.8million will become eligible for the old age pension. WE really need a high birthrate to be able to sustain an ageing population.

Instead of slating areas with a high birthrate, we should be congratulating them
the whole system in the uk relies on continued sustained growth.

it's possibly the world's biggest "Ponzi".

it is therefore probably doomed to fail, eventually, when the required level of growth inevitably becomes unsustainable - as ponzis invariably do.
Instead of slating areas with a high birthrate, we should be congratulating them



Not if they will be on benefits.
My partner regularly flies between the UK and South Africa. A few weeks ago she was unable to get a seat on either of the two usual airlines she uses and her travel agent booked her on to an Ethiopian Airlines flight from Johannesburg to London.

But they do not fly direct and she had to change planes at Addis Ababa. She said the aircraft were good and the flight staff excellent. But her description of the airport during her four hour stopover fell into line with what I most people envisage the country to be like: virtually no facilities and very few, basic toilets
// Not if they will be on benefits. //

Obviously not if they are on benefits. But that probably won't happen. All the fruit pickers and shift workers get their jobs because the feckless lazy inginenous scroungers won't get out of bed.
//because the feckless lazy inginenous scroungers won't get out of bed.//

i assume you mean "indigenous"?

would you get out of bed to pick fruit if you were going to get £2.50 an hour and only 18 hours work a week and have to live in a shed?
// would you get out of bed to pick fruit if you were going to get £2.50 an hour and only 18 hours work a week and have to live in a shed? /

No. And neither do the eastern Europeans.

Would you get out of bed to work a full week at or above the minimum wage and be properly hosed? Unfortunately many long term unemployed won't.
After being in the fields all day, you would want to be properly hosed.

Then go home to a proper house.
//neither do the eastern Europeans.//

that's true, up to a point. those that tend to get stuck in this particular trap are those who find themselves in the "grey" economy. so whose is the bigger crime - those trying to better themselves? or those who seek to take advantage of them in the most ruthless of manners?
VHG , how do you define 'dependent children' ? To a lawyer it only means dependent on their parents , not dependent on the state. Did you think it meant the latter, or were you merely commenting that there are bigger families in Tower Hamlets?

21 to 40 of 40rss feed

First Previous 1 2

Do you know the answer?

Ethiopian Airways Dreamliner

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.