Ukba Refusing To Issue Sons Papers To Come To Uk..immigration

[beezaneez]

we won a high court battle against ukba april 13. 6 months on and ukba have refused to issue our sons papers to come to uk. we originally were refused 3 years ago, then appealed and won. then ukba had 14 days to launcha an appeal which they didnt so we were waiting on sons papers to come through so as to travel to collect kids. then after 34 days ukba gave courts notice to launch an out of date late appeal, this went in front of original judge who awarded our sons the right to reside in uk and same judge told ukba that they had no grounds whatsoever to launch out of date appeal and even gave a scathing responce to ukba about their behavior and telling them they had no chance of winning an appeal and our sons had won the original case on two counts i.e family life and eu law. since then i made complaint to ukba and i got message back from them to say they still cannot give us the papers as it is in hands of their lawyers and its a complex case. our westminster mp has written to mark harper immigration minister and our lawyer is now issuing case against ukba for damages. i think its discusting behavoir the ukba cannot give our kids who are suffering the right to reside with their mother even after a high court ruling 6 months ago, are children are 13 for gods sake and left with nothing, their mother is in great distress over this . i want to go to national newspapers over this and we will fight to the bitter end over this very unfair behavior

[factor-fiction]

I would let your MP and lawyer continue with what they are doing- going to the press will only complicate things or annoy those trying to resolve it..

[Peter Pedant]

You clearly have had lots of advice about the law on this - I doubt if we can add anything.

Go public whilst the case is still live ? I wouldnt because it may not do any good. Mansfield 1762 - yes 1762 R v WIlkes Let justice be done even tho the heavens fall - is because Ld Mansfield is going fearlessly to give the judgement even tho the London mob was outside the court house baying for his blood. Just in case you wonder: Ld M found for the govt and not wilkes - but ho hum, that's life innit.

[New Judge]

Of course the High Court ruling must be acted upon somehow or the other and you will need to continue to work with your lawyer as factor has suggested. The only thing I do somewhat disagree with is that the children are being denied the right to live with their mother. She, of course, can always afford them that right by going to live with them.