ChatterBank0 min ago
The Met Police Couldn't Nick Nick Jim
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by sir.prize. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Well, well, well sp1814 - that is almost the same as I said in the first sentence of my post at 23:06 Wednesday. Check out Andropause via Google.
Meanwhile will you be withdrawing via apology for your protestations aimed at the Ab Editor?
You can do that privately if you wish via the Contact Us button at the foot of this page.
Meanwhile will you be withdrawing via apology for your protestations aimed at the Ab Editor?
You can do that privately if you wish via the Contact Us button at the foot of this page.
sir.prize, Mr Brandman, Jim Davidson's solicitor, will not be preparing any reply to the Met or anyone. He's got the result. And Jim Davidson himself has spoken eloquently to Sky News, saying he has no complaints whatsoever about the police, the police have a job to do, it all takes time to investigate such accusations thoroughly etc
Only a cynic could see the hand of Henri Brandman in that statement or think that he had suggested that his client make it !
Only a cynic could see the hand of Henri Brandman in that statement or think that he had suggested that his client make it !
Peter,knowing the man as I do (and I do), I would not be in the least surprised that the reason Sky News got this exclusive interview is that they alone among national broadcasters have got money and Henri Brandman had a hand in demanding and negotiating his client a suitable fee for giving it ! In fact, I'd bet on it. You don't have a whole career in show business representation without knowing the ins and outs.
-- answer removed --
Thank you Ummmm. My abuser has been 'flagged' so if he offends again or someone reports him for previous abuse, his details will come up. As much as I would like him to serve time, I hope I was the only one 'he chose'.
As I said in my first post, it must be horrific to be accused of a sexual crime (or any crime for that matter) that you are not guilty of. Equally horrific to see the person that abused you from the age of 9 to 12 years walk free due to lack of evidence, because I was terrified of reporting it at the time.
As I said in my first post, it must be horrific to be accused of a sexual crime (or any crime for that matter) that you are not guilty of. Equally horrific to see the person that abused you from the age of 9 to 12 years walk free due to lack of evidence, because I was terrified of reporting it at the time.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.