ChatterBank1 min ago
Should The Daily Mail Web Site Be Banned From Answerbank?
50 Answers
It would appear from the various of anti Daily Mail comments that appear regularly on the news section of Answerbank, that many would only be too pleased to see it banned from this site.
Since the Daily Mail has the largest combined monthly readership according to this Guardian report.
/// Overall, the Daily Mail still had the largest combined monthly readership across the board with 18.8 million print and online readers, followed by the Sun with just under 17 million and the Guardian in third. In terms of weekly and daily readers, the Sun remained the most popular newspaper with 12.6 million and 7.2 million combined readers respectively. ///
What does this say about some contributors to this site, are they themselves closeted readers of this newspaper and don't like to admit it?
Since the Daily Mail has the largest combined monthly readership according to this Guardian report.
/// Overall, the Daily Mail still had the largest combined monthly readership across the board with 18.8 million print and online readers, followed by the Sun with just under 17 million and the Guardian in third. In terms of weekly and daily readers, the Sun remained the most popular newspaper with 12.6 million and 7.2 million combined readers respectively. ///
What does this say about some contributors to this site, are they themselves closeted readers of this newspaper and don't like to admit it?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.@aog (re OP)
No, it should not be banned. We need reactionary huffing and puffing from the DM so as to have something to have a giggle at, of a morn'
By the way, I am still largely convinced that you are actually in the pay of the DM, in a kind of "cash for posting links" fashion. By all means disabuse me of this notion, at your convenience :O)
No, it should not be banned. We need reactionary huffing and puffing from the DM so as to have something to have a giggle at, of a morn'
By the way, I am still largely convinced that you are actually in the pay of the DM, in a kind of "cash for posting links" fashion. By all means disabuse me of this notion, at your convenience :O)
Svejk
It's more that some of us criticise Mail stories because they are so heavily 'spun'. So many times we have to look to other sites (Telegraph, BBC, Guardian) to find out the facts of a story, rather than viewing through the rabid prism go the Mail.
AOG seems to think that the Mail's readership numbers are an indication of quality.
Using that logic - the best programme on television is Corrie, and the finest food you could eat in a restaurant - is Heinz baked beans followed by Kelloggs corn flakes.
Outstanding...
It's more that some of us criticise Mail stories because they are so heavily 'spun'. So many times we have to look to other sites (Telegraph, BBC, Guardian) to find out the facts of a story, rather than viewing through the rabid prism go the Mail.
AOG seems to think that the Mail's readership numbers are an indication of quality.
Using that logic - the best programme on television is Corrie, and the finest food you could eat in a restaurant - is Heinz baked beans followed by Kelloggs corn flakes.
Outstanding...
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.