Leap In Unemployment Rate Raises...
News1 min ago
What Planet Is This Guy On?
19 Answers
http://
Now I know our plod have their moments but this guy takes the biscuit!
Now I know our plod have their moments but this guy takes the biscuit!
Answers
1 to 19 of 19
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by ToraToraTora. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Er - anybody bother to read the whole article?
Before you get too outraged it rather looks as if he was taken severely out of context
"Do we have the enforcement?" Mr Sinha said at the event in New Delhi on Tuesday about whether sports betting should be legalised.
"It is very easy to say that if you can't enforce it, it's like saying if you can't prevent rape, you enjoy it."
In the current climate the analogy was a rather unfortunate and ill advised one but people are deliberately making trouble here
And journalists are hoping people will be too lazy to read down the page
Before you get too outraged it rather looks as if he was taken severely out of context
"Do we have the enforcement?" Mr Sinha said at the event in New Delhi on Tuesday about whether sports betting should be legalised.
"It is very easy to say that if you can't enforce it, it's like saying if you can't prevent rape, you enjoy it."
In the current climate the analogy was a rather unfortunate and ill advised one but people are deliberately making trouble here
And journalists are hoping people will be too lazy to read down the page
I had to read the article three times before I got it.
He was not saying that if you can't prevent rape you should enjoy it.
Please re-read the article. He was not condoning rape.
The first time I read it, I came to that conclusion, but you really have to read it carefully, because he worded his thoughts extremely badly. He was talking about betting laws.
He is guilty of using an appalling analogy.
He was not saying that if you can't prevent rape you should enjoy it.
Please re-read the article. He was not condoning rape.
The first time I read it, I came to that conclusion, but you really have to read it carefully, because he worded his thoughts extremely badly. He was talking about betting laws.
He is guilty of using an appalling analogy.
Incidentally - before we saddle up our high horses condemning rape in India - check out the stats in the link.
We ain't so far behind...and just look at the US:
http://
We ain't so far behind...and just look at the US:
http://
Rape in India has been described by Radha Kumar as one of India's most common crimes against women[1] and by the UN’s human-rights chief as a “national problem”.[2] Marital rape is not a criminal offence.[3]
While per-capita reported incidents of rape are quite low compared to other countries, even developed countries.[4][5] According to 2012 statistics, New Delhi has the highest number of rape-reports among Indian cities, while Jabalpur has the per capita incidence of reported rapes.[6][7] Sources show that rape cases in India have doubled between 1990 and 2008.[8] According to the National Crime Records Bureau, 24,206 rape cases were registered in India in 2011, although experts agree that the unreported cases of sexual assault is much higher.[9]
A new case is reported every 20 minutes.[10][11] However the latest estimate suggest a new case every 22 minutes.[12]
I'm in two minds whether Sky have deliberately reported this in a manner designed to mislead or whether it's poor journalism
I'm tending to lean towards the former I have to say
They've written at the top in bold:
India's top police chief is facing calls for his resignation after he said: "If you can't prevent rape, you might as well enjoy it."
That wasn't what he said - they've missed out the start of the sentence
It's the sort of thing I've come to expect from the Daily Mail
Sky really need to decide whether they want to be a serious News provider or yet another purveyor of cornflake spitters
I'm tending to lean towards the former I have to say
They've written at the top in bold:
India's top police chief is facing calls for his resignation after he said: "If you can't prevent rape, you might as well enjoy it."
That wasn't what he said - they've missed out the start of the sentence
It's the sort of thing I've come to expect from the Daily Mail
Sky really need to decide whether they want to be a serious News provider or yet another purveyor of cornflake spitters
I think we should recognise that two different things are being woven into the same thread here.
Because of the recent horrific rape cases in India, it has now become the focus of world attention, when in fact, it should be the USA, which has four times the number of rape cases per capita than India.
That's being mixed into this badly worded report, which at first glance makes it look as if this copper is saying, "Well, if you can't prevent rape, you may as well enjoy it".
Anyone reading that would jump to the conclusion (as I did when I first read it) that 'no wonder India is facing a problem if this is how senior policemen view rape"
This is not what he said.
I only clocked that after reading the article again carefully.
India is rightly facing flack over this, but it isn't the rape capital of the world.
Because of the recent horrific rape cases in India, it has now become the focus of world attention, when in fact, it should be the USA, which has four times the number of rape cases per capita than India.
That's being mixed into this badly worded report, which at first glance makes it look as if this copper is saying, "Well, if you can't prevent rape, you may as well enjoy it".
Anyone reading that would jump to the conclusion (as I did when I first read it) that 'no wonder India is facing a problem if this is how senior policemen view rape"
This is not what he said.
I only clocked that after reading the article again carefully.
India is rightly facing flack over this, but it isn't the rape capital of the world.
This is a lethal combination of a seriously misjudged analogy coupled with sensationlist journalism - something akin to a bucket of petrol / bonfire interface.
This man made a serious error of judgement in using a very poor analogy to illustrate a point he was making.
The press have seized on his comment and quoted it out of context, inferring that he said something which he did not say - which is that he thinks women being raped should enjoy it if they cannot prevent it.
Context is everything.
He is right to apologise for he poor choice of comparison, but he does not deserve to be pilloried for saying something which he did not actually convey if the full meaning and structure of what he said is made available.
This man made a serious error of judgement in using a very poor analogy to illustrate a point he was making.
The press have seized on his comment and quoted it out of context, inferring that he said something which he did not say - which is that he thinks women being raped should enjoy it if they cannot prevent it.
Context is everything.
He is right to apologise for he poor choice of comparison, but he does not deserve to be pilloried for saying something which he did not actually convey if the full meaning and structure of what he said is made available.
1 to 19 of 19
