ChatterBank47 mins ago
What A Surprise Eu Commision Finds Against Britain!
13 Answers
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by ToraToraTora. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Are you arguing against the legal principle, Tora? If so, you'll have difficulty explaining Britain's own practice in having border controls for everyone, including British and other EU citizens.
Or are you arguing against the way Spain suddenly decided to apply the legal principle? There you are on stronger ground. But on that ground the EU Commission found for Britain, not against Britain. So what is your complaint?
Britain could never hope to win on the first ground, and must have known that. The point of the exercise was to win on the second ground. And there Britain succeeded.
Or are you arguing against the way Spain suddenly decided to apply the legal principle? There you are on stronger ground. But on that ground the EU Commission found for Britain, not against Britain. So what is your complaint?
Britain could never hope to win on the first ground, and must have known that. The point of the exercise was to win on the second ground. And there Britain succeeded.
/Finds Against Britain!/
That's a flimsy bit of spin T3
The Commission found that Spain weren't doing anything illegal with their border checks
Well that was obvious from the start - that's why they did it; annoying but perfectly legitimate.
The Commission have made practical suggestions for speeding up the process and will monitor spanish implementation
- it's a drawn out game in which Spain holds (and uses) some good cards as long as life in Gibraltar is dependent on movement in and out of Spain
That's just part of the deal if you are a Gibraltarian
That's a flimsy bit of spin T3
The Commission found that Spain weren't doing anything illegal with their border checks
Well that was obvious from the start - that's why they did it; annoying but perfectly legitimate.
The Commission have made practical suggestions for speeding up the process and will monitor spanish implementation
- it's a drawn out game in which Spain holds (and uses) some good cards as long as life in Gibraltar is dependent on movement in and out of Spain
That's just part of the deal if you are a Gibraltarian
OK, let's take them one at a time shall we:
Jake:It is overall bout the fact that Spain Claims Gib. The reef was juts the latest excuse. Spanish Fishermen needed to be curtailed they still do, ask the Canadians for example. The reef Was legally laid in Gib waters.
Fred: No, border checks are necessary and they should be carried out as quickly as possible not delayed just to annoy the thousands of workers who cross from Spain daily to work in Gib and in the process obstruct the whole system.
Zeuhl: Yes but if we are supposed to be one happy EU family why are they arguing about a piece of Non EU Land? None of us have "independence" anyway, we are all subject to the EU jackboot.
Jake:It is overall bout the fact that Spain Claims Gib. The reef was juts the latest excuse. Spanish Fishermen needed to be curtailed they still do, ask the Canadians for example. The reef Was legally laid in Gib waters.
Fred: No, border checks are necessary and they should be carried out as quickly as possible not delayed just to annoy the thousands of workers who cross from Spain daily to work in Gib and in the process obstruct the whole system.
Zeuhl: Yes but if we are supposed to be one happy EU family why are they arguing about a piece of Non EU Land? None of us have "independence" anyway, we are all subject to the EU jackboot.
Then, Tora, you must be agreeing that the EU Commission ruled in favour of the UK, on the second ground concerning Spain's obstruction. So why did you say that the Commission found 'against Britain' ?
The clue may be not in your reading of the report but in your use of the words that we are all subject to 'the EU jackboot'. That is a sincere feeling but here the jackboot has been applied in our favour, has it not ?
The clue may be not in your reading of the report but in your use of the words that we are all subject to 'the EU jackboot'. That is a sincere feeling but here the jackboot has been applied in our favour, has it not ?
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.