Donate SIGN UP

siamese twins

Avatar Image
modge | 13:54 Tue 05th Feb 2002 | News
3 Answers
Why is the separation of Siamese twins so controversial - surely it's better to have one healthy baby that two disabled ones?
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 3 of 3rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by modge. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
The statement "better to have one healthy baby than two disabled ones" sounds fine, in theory - but this is not theory, this is the lives of two children, as well as their parents, and the doctor(s) who must make the agonising decision. Some conjoined twins have grown to adulthood, and would be aghast at the notion of on perishing to 'save' the other. Conjoined twins know no other existence, problems we would imagine to be insurmountable are normality to them - who makes the decision about who lives, or dies? One healthy baby from two disabled? This is children's lives, not an Airfix kit. Think about it, how would you feel if it were your twins ... or you?
Aply the pleasure principle: Greatest good for the greatest number. Two healthy but disabled people is better than one healthy able bodied one. Previous cases have been where one twin woould live after separation but both would die without it, which is a whole different situation.
There is an article about the conjoined twins on Answerbank - just click article 2825

1 to 3 of 3rss feed

Do you know the answer?

siamese twins

Answer Question >>