ChatterBank3 mins ago
Inquisitor 1336
8 Answers
Anyone finished this ? I have and think it's an excellent puzzle but am bugged that the solution isn't accurate enough for my liking. Also, anyone noticed the letters of the finder's name in the grid to the right or is that just coincidence ?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Gregsdad. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Not clear what you mean by the solution not being "accurate enough" - seems OK to me. Only the setter can tell you about the name; I notice that the letters of a second name associated with the object also appear (in two disjointed chunks) on the right. It would have been nice to have had a few more parts of the object worked into the grid.
Hi
I may have misinterpreted the instructions but I drew a line through the blank cells, starting at top of 22D, to depict the object. As i read it, the four over-long clues, besides fitting into the 14-cell clockwise depiction of the object, yield the value of the object itself. This is not quite accurate....unless we're supposed to populate the intervening cells with numerals ? Presume the title refers to another type of number.
I may have misinterpreted the instructions but I drew a line through the blank cells, starting at top of 22D, to depict the object. As i read it, the four over-long clues, besides fitting into the 14-cell clockwise depiction of the object, yield the value of the object itself. This is not quite accurate....unless we're supposed to populate the intervening cells with numerals ? Presume the title refers to another type of number.
Hi Shikasta
Did think about that but it just seems to sort of jar with the clever wordplay and solutions to the four over-long clues. But thinking about it, it's more satisfactory than a boring line, so thanks. For the title I think we're talking about the numbers that result in hyperactive kids (supposedly). !
Did think about that but it just seems to sort of jar with the clever wordplay and solutions to the four over-long clues. But thinking about it, it's more satisfactory than a boring line, so thanks. For the title I think we're talking about the numbers that result in hyperactive kids (supposedly). !