ChatterBank0 min ago
Yet Another Child Cruelty Case
http:// www.bbc .co.uk/ news/uk -englan d-manch ester-2 8358844
"In 2011, the child's primary school referred her to social services because of concern about her welfare.
She moved schools and her new teachers noticed the girl complained about not getting breakfast and was gorging herself at lunchtime"
So, yet again a child is severely maltreated and the school stands by and does nothing. After Daniel Pelka, you would have thought Schools would be more proactive but not in case it would seem.
"In 2011, the child's primary school referred her to social services because of concern about her welfare.
She moved schools and her new teachers noticed the girl complained about not getting breakfast and was gorging herself at lunchtime"
So, yet again a child is severely maltreated and the school stands by and does nothing. After Daniel Pelka, you would have thought Schools would be more proactive but not in case it would seem.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by mikey4444. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Excuse me but the school is not the parent here. AND they did report it to social services so I think your bias against the school is unfounded.
Perhpas w soial services that you should be directing your ire.
The only thing the school can do is report it (which th ) and wherever they can, feed the child. Which by the article they did because the child gorged herself at lunch times.
Perhpas w soial services that you should be directing your ire.
The only thing the school can do is report it (which th ) and wherever they can, feed the child. Which by the article they did because the child gorged herself at lunch times.