Film, Media & TV1 min ago
Health And Safety Law
having the great (mis) fortune to have a construction health and safety professional in the family, we can't watch programs like "grand designs" without enormous shouting and cries of "where's your edge protection...?"
what i wanted to know though, was if the builders are doing blatantly dangerous things, and it's recorded for the program but no-one gets injured, could the H+s executive retrospectively prosecute someone after the prog was shown?
what i wanted to know though, was if the builders are doing blatantly dangerous things, and it's recorded for the program but no-one gets injured, could the H+s executive retrospectively prosecute someone after the prog was shown?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by bednobs. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.The one I was thinking of - - is this busy Manchester family
http:// www.man chester evening news.co .uk/all -about/ dale-cr egan
who has kept the printing presses rolling
the incident was that a side-member had been filmed receiving a post code lotto win and then was in court on benefits fraud
but as you can see if you access it - I cant quite locate it amongst all the detail
http://
who has kept the printing presses rolling
the incident was that a side-member had been filmed receiving a post code lotto win and then was in court on benefits fraud
but as you can see if you access it - I cant quite locate it amongst all the detail
this is kinda it
http:// www.exp ress.co .uk/new s/uk/46 8362/Lo tto-win ner-was -a-bene fits-ch eat
but I was definitely thinking of the ad where they carry in a huge card board cheque for £20k - cue grossly overweight women screaming -
and then finding one lucky winnerwas on benefits.... In Droylsden - cue court case
http://
but I was definitely thinking of the ad where they carry in a huge card board cheque for £20k - cue grossly overweight women screaming -
and then finding one lucky winnerwas on benefits.... In Droylsden - cue court case
and all sorts of other nasty things can happen to lotto winners and do !
http:// www.mon eymatte rs360.c om/inde x.php/w hy-winn ing-the -lotter y-can-b e-a-fin ancial- disaste r-2933/
http://
I thought prosecutions under H&S laws occurred only if employers did not provide the correct safety equipment or made their employees work in ways that against the H&S rules. I thought it is the employers that get prosecuted, not the employees.
As a home owner I could not be prosecuted if I repair my guttering by standing on the roof barefoot in a thunderstorm with no safety gear. If I was an employer and forced my employee to do that, I could be prosecuted.
As a home owner I could not be prosecuted if I repair my guttering by standing on the roof barefoot in a thunderstorm with no safety gear. If I was an employer and forced my employee to do that, I could be prosecuted.