Quizzes & Puzzles0 min ago
How Can My Friend Get To Work?
I have a friend who has been unemployed for 2 years now. But his wife works full-time, so even though she doesn't earn a lot, he's not entitled to any benefits whatsoever, despite the fact that he's been searching for a job every day.
The good news is that he's just landed a full-time job. It's very physical, which he doesn't mind, but he's worried about transport to and from work until he gets his first wage in two weeks time. He starts every morning at 6 am before the bus service starts, and it's much too far for him to walk! Surely, he should be entitled to some kind of help with transport until he gets his wages. Anyone got any ideas?
The good news is that he's just landed a full-time job. It's very physical, which he doesn't mind, but he's worried about transport to and from work until he gets his first wage in two weeks time. He starts every morning at 6 am before the bus service starts, and it's much too far for him to walk! Surely, he should be entitled to some kind of help with transport until he gets his wages. Anyone got any ideas?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by san070160. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I'm rather shocked to hear that he's not entitled to any benefits at all, just because his wife works full-time. When this happened to us, OH could claim something (it was a while ago so no doubt it's changed now).
I don't really understand what the problem is. If the bus service hasn't started by the time he has to start, surely it doesn't matter whether he's got money or not - how's he going to get there once he's got paid, what difference does that make?
It's certainly not an "entitlement" to have help to get to work - the employer isn't concerned with how anyone gets to work, as long as you turn up.
I don't really understand what the problem is. If the bus service hasn't started by the time he has to start, surely it doesn't matter whether he's got money or not - how's he going to get there once he's got paid, what difference does that make?
It's certainly not an "entitlement" to have help to get to work - the employer isn't concerned with how anyone gets to work, as long as you turn up.
For Boxtops:
The system hasn't changed. For the first 6 months after becoming unemployed (assuming a recent full record of National Insurance contributions) a person is eligible for Contribution-Based JSA, which isn't means-tested. (A billionaire with mansions, yachts and private jets could get it as long as he was actively seeking employment).
There is no entitlement to Contribution-Based JSA after 6 months but an application can then be made for Income-Based JSA. However it's means-tested, with a partner's income being taken into account. That means that someone living with a partner, who is working full-time, will get absolutely nothing.
For San070160:
Your friend could ask the new employer to let him put up a notice at the workplace, asking if anyone can offer him a daily lift (on a 'shared fuel' basis). Otherwise, as has been indicated above, his best (or indeed only) option would seem to be to borrow (or buy) a bicycle.
The system hasn't changed. For the first 6 months after becoming unemployed (assuming a recent full record of National Insurance contributions) a person is eligible for Contribution-Based JSA, which isn't means-tested. (A billionaire with mansions, yachts and private jets could get it as long as he was actively seeking employment).
There is no entitlement to Contribution-Based JSA after 6 months but an application can then be made for Income-Based JSA. However it's means-tested, with a partner's income being taken into account. That means that someone living with a partner, who is working full-time, will get absolutely nothing.
For San070160:
Your friend could ask the new employer to let him put up a notice at the workplace, asking if anyone can offer him a daily lift (on a 'shared fuel' basis). Otherwise, as has been indicated above, his best (or indeed only) option would seem to be to borrow (or buy) a bicycle.
jomifl, you have to be joking. The government is propping up employers by supplementing the minimum wage with tax credits, housing benefit, council tax benefit and all sorts of other benefits that workers should not need if they were paid a proper wage.
Problem is, if minimum income earners were paid a living wage, all other wages would go up in proportion, the cost of everything would have to go up so the minimum wage earners would need government help with rent, council tax......
Problem is, if minimum income earners were paid a living wage, all other wages would go up in proportion, the cost of everything would have to go up so the minimum wage earners would need government help with rent, council tax......