Road rules1 min ago
Landlords Rights
I have a tenant who originally held an assured shorthold tenancy (England). The tenancy has long since lapsed into a monthly periodic tenancy by virtue of the fact that the AST agreement was not renewed. This has been acceptable on both sides, but now I would prefer to ask the tenant to sign a further Assured Shorthold Tenancy Agreement. Would I be within my rights to do this?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by notlynx. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Yes, I believe so, however if the periodic tenancy is working it might be worth just leaving as-is unless you want to increase the rent (in which case yes, you would have to provide written notice).
The only issue you have if you go ahead with a new AST agreement would be the reluctance from the tenant if they are unsure as to their length of stay and decide to move out altogether, which may be a blessing provided you have an interested party ready to move in and agree to your AST.
A good link to have a gad-at is below:
http:// england .shelte r.org.u k/get_a dvice/p rivate_ renting
Hope whatever you do works out well notlynx :-)
The only issue you have if you go ahead with a new AST agreement would be the reluctance from the tenant if they are unsure as to their length of stay and decide to move out altogether, which may be a blessing provided you have an interested party ready to move in and agree to your AST.
A good link to have a gad-at is below:
http://
Hope whatever you do works out well notlynx :-)