ChatterBank0 min ago
More Skulduggery From The Bankers
... and saying sorry will no doubt once again get them off the hook.
But if an unemployed single mother on benefit gave evidence which "lacked clarity" she could apologise all she liked, they would still throw the book at her.
One law for the rich (e.g. Osborne's cronies) and one for the poor.
British juctice - is it fair ?
But if an unemployed single mother on benefit gave evidence which "lacked clarity" she could apologise all she liked, they would still throw the book at her.
One law for the rich (e.g. Osborne's cronies) and one for the poor.
British juctice - is it fair ?
Answers
Just when you think Bankers cant get any lower in our estimation.. along comes yet another mess. Their reputation was already in the gutter but now, its seems it's sunk into the sewer.
08:54 Mon 24th Nov 2014
The banks have been corrupt for years...this shouldn't be a surprise to anybody. They have used every trick in the book, including fraud, to make themselves richer. But what happens ? Vague slaps over the wrist and large pension pay-offs.
I hope the day will come when officials are handcuffed and led out of offices into those vans that Police use for hooligans, instead of being treated with kid gloves.
I used to be a Financial Advisor up until 2008 but left because it was impossible to remain and work ethically.
The ones at the top are shysters, pure and simple.
I hope the day will come when officials are handcuffed and led out of offices into those vans that Police use for hooligans, instead of being treated with kid gloves.
I used to be a Financial Advisor up until 2008 but left because it was impossible to remain and work ethically.
The ones at the top are shysters, pure and simple.
-- answer removed --
Here is a link to the story.
http:// www.bbc .co.uk/ news/bu siness- 3017232 6
Giving evidence to a Parliamentary Select Commitee, the bankers told lies, under oath. The subsequently changed their evidence by letter to the committee admitting their answers "lacked clarity".
At the very least they should be brought before the committee again, and this time warned they will be in contempt if they try to mislead parliament again.
http://
Giving evidence to a Parliamentary Select Commitee, the bankers told lies, under oath. The subsequently changed their evidence by letter to the committee admitting their answers "lacked clarity".
At the very least they should be brought before the committee again, and this time warned they will be in contempt if they try to mislead parliament again.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.