The article banana posted is certainly interesting. I confess that I only skimmed it, but I don't remember seeing anything stating that the guy who raped the girl in Kosovo was stationed at the base. If not, isn't this a bit like saying English guys have committed violent rapes, there's lots of them in Majorca, so they're probably responsible for any rapes that happen there? The "witch hunt" claims it makes are perhaps more valid: the papers are all proclaiming that Huntley claimed that a girl at the school had a crush on him, implying that this proves he was a paedophile. My thoughts after having read the article was that surely it was good that he told someone in authority about it - wouldn't a paedophile have kept it to himself? It's all very confusing, and whilst I would hate to see anyone who had committed such crimes go free, it certainly shows how media reporting can possibly unfairly shape our views. I also feel that it will be very hard for the jury to come to an unbiased opinion, at least based on the evidence we know about so far. The sort of crimes that Huntley is accused of quite rightly invoke a deep-seated disgust in all normal people, and if any of the members of the jury feel that there is insufficient evidence to reach a guilty verdict, I suspect that they will be pressured into voting guilty by other, more volatile, jurors.