Family & Relationships5 mins ago
What Happenned To The Benefits Cap?
30 Answers
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by ToraToraTora. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.factor-fiction, // I think it's far too entrenched//
That’s the problem, isn’t it. It’s become an expectation.
//it's a way of saying only the well off can have children//
Unlike this man, people who take responsibility for themselves, regardless of wealth, have only the number of children they can afford – and that’s how it should be. If people can't afford to keep their children, they shouldn't expect the rest of us to bear the burden.
That’s the problem, isn’t it. It’s become an expectation.
//it's a way of saying only the well off can have children//
Unlike this man, people who take responsibility for themselves, regardless of wealth, have only the number of children they can afford – and that’s how it should be. If people can't afford to keep their children, they shouldn't expect the rest of us to bear the burden.
"and every penny goes towards the house and the children"
Yes, and who is responsible for this selfish population explosion, and should be the one providing the wealth ? How can anyone really think that the rest of society owes the feckless a living ?
Society should be offering him a free sterilisation, arguably a compulsory one, not that I'd support that, and leaving him to house his family and pay for their needs. There is a point where someone is just taking the *** and ought to be guilty of a crime against society. If the brood is to be taken into care he should be also in care where he can't find an opportunity to lose control of his reproductive system.
Yes, and who is responsible for this selfish population explosion, and should be the one providing the wealth ? How can anyone really think that the rest of society owes the feckless a living ?
Society should be offering him a free sterilisation, arguably a compulsory one, not that I'd support that, and leaving him to house his family and pay for their needs. There is a point where someone is just taking the *** and ought to be guilty of a crime against society. If the brood is to be taken into care he should be also in care where he can't find an opportunity to lose control of his reproductive system.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.