Question Author
No you get nothing at the end of it - it's a level term assurance which pays out on death.
To compare like with like - yes I would expect an 80 year old to pay less than a 60 year old, if they're covering for up to the same age.
So say, for example, the 60 year old and the 80 year old want cover for up to the age of 90:
The 80 year old needs cover from the age of 80 up to the age of 90.
We can break the 60 year old's cover into 2 parts:
Cover from the age of 60 to the age of 80
and
cover from the age of 80 to the age of 90.
With the 60 year old, there's clearly more risk, as they have the added period from the age of 60 to 80, then the rest of the cover is identical to the 80 year old's, viz: cover from the age of 80 to 90.
I don't get it lol :P