Me: Suggesting soundproof booths.
Svejk
^duh, it wouldn't be a bloody debate, would it?
A debate is people taking turns to put their view.
People talking simultaneously, making it impossible to decipher what either of them are saying is -not- debate.
Shouting louder than the opponent, to drown out their words such that only your words can be heard is -not- debate: it is a schoolyard shouting match.
Part of the art of debate is -listening- to what the other person has to say and, temporarily, memorising what they are saying so that you can issue challenges to their points -when it comes to your turn to speak-.
Due to either rudeness or short-term memory problems, people on TV shows insist on cutting in immediately and blotting out the remainder of what the first speaker was saying.
If the first speaker is lying, as often they are accused of being, by the interruptor, I need to hear the lie in full so that I can recognise it the next time it is repeated.
It becomes even more annoying when, becomes even more annoying when, becomes even more annoying when time is wasted by a speaker uselessly repeating a phrase, in an effort to cut through, waiting for the moment when the rude guy shuts up and lets them finish.
There are much worse things in the world to be bothered by than this but it is currently the thing that annoys me the most, these days.