Quizzes & Puzzles58 mins ago
Why ?
25 Answers
Why do some people have to use potentially abusive versions of Ed Milliband's name when referring to him (we've already seen millimoses amd millipede this morning) ?
Descending to name-calling is usually a sign of poverty of valid argument.
Descending to name-calling is usually a sign of poverty of valid argument.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Canary42. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.//The worst I've seen anyone call Osborne is Gideon, which is actually his name//
guilty as charged on that one. If we're calling him George in future, so be it...
http:// i.daily mail.co .uk/i/p ix/2015 /04/09/ 17/2767 D9F7000 00578-0 -image- m-58_14 2859770 5657.jp g
guilty as charged on that one. If we're calling him George in future, so be it...
http://
For the most part I agree, but I have to admit "EdStone" and "Millstone" were quite funny (both better than "Milimoses"). If you're going to come up with a stunt like that, you deserve to have the pee mercilessly taken out of you in whatever way is available. This should be natural selection in action, as it should discourage such idiotic stunts in future ... but unfortunately in 2015 they're still happening.