Family & Relationships0 min ago
Should Newspapers Print Pictures Of The Queen Giving Nazis Salute?
Some down market newspapers today have printed photographs of the Queen, aged 7 years old, practising the Nazi salute, in the gardens of Buckingham Palace.
http:// www.tel egraph. co.uk/n ews/ukn ews/que en-eliz abeth-I I/11748 024/Buc kingham -Palace -disapp ointed- at-1933 -footag e-relea sed-by- The-Sun .html
Is there a public interest justification for printing the pictures?
Or is it disrespectful to her majesty?
http://
Is there a public interest justification for printing the pictures?
Or is it disrespectful to her majesty?
Answers
Surely engineered and published to bring unneccesary distress to the poor Queen in her 90th year. Disgraceful. The Sun should be sued for receiving/ publishing stolen material. Just a childish action that has been done over the years - how many children have put their finger across their top lip to look like a moustache and raised their arm and said Heil...
08:56 Sat 18th Jul 2015
Talbot, I would think that nobody in 1933 knew what would happen in six years time, so how can any of them in the photos be castigated. Adults, children, diplomats, politicians: none of them could foresee what would ensue in years to come. I'm sure that may people had opinions as to what might happen; however, they were just opinions, much like we have on here.
Stuey
Sir Winston Churchill had a mole in the secret service who fed him information about the illegal expansion of the German Airforce. (Think this was depicted in the Wilderness Years).
Churchill subtly introduced this information into parliamentary debates without trying to implicate his source.
All of what Churchill said came about but all the others used to heckle him as a nuisance and claim he was a scaremonger.
Perhaps if they all accepted what he predicted they would of known what was likely to come and "The Few" would of been more able to match the Luftewaffe in numbers.
Sir Winston Churchill had a mole in the secret service who fed him information about the illegal expansion of the German Airforce. (Think this was depicted in the Wilderness Years).
Churchill subtly introduced this information into parliamentary debates without trying to implicate his source.
All of what Churchill said came about but all the others used to heckle him as a nuisance and claim he was a scaremonger.
Perhaps if they all accepted what he predicted they would of known what was likely to come and "The Few" would of been more able to match the Luftewaffe in numbers.
//does anyone want to defend her? //
what is there to defend, talbot?
at the time the film was shot, hitler had ben chancellor for barely a few months, and paul hindenburg was still head of state. the supression of certain basic rights that spring followed in the wake of the reichstag fire and although reprehensible, wouldn't have been seen by outsiders (then) for the repression it actually was. the night of the long knives was still a year in the future, and kristallnacht was 5 years away. how could anyone in summer 1933 know what was coming? how does hindsight give us the right to criticise those who still had no way of knowing, the right to judge those of the 1930s against the values of the 21st century?
what is there to defend, talbot?
at the time the film was shot, hitler had ben chancellor for barely a few months, and paul hindenburg was still head of state. the supression of certain basic rights that spring followed in the wake of the reichstag fire and although reprehensible, wouldn't have been seen by outsiders (then) for the repression it actually was. the night of the long knives was still a year in the future, and kristallnacht was 5 years away. how could anyone in summer 1933 know what was coming? how does hindsight give us the right to criticise those who still had no way of knowing, the right to judge those of the 1930s against the values of the 21st century?
It is surely significant that the "owner" of this film has hung on until all the participants except one are dead, and the one still alive is not in a position to comment (even if she remembers the incident, which is not necessarily likely as it is as Ann so rightly stated - see Best Answer - a typical bit of children's fun.)
Well done Gromit in awarding Ann the Best Answer.
Well done Gromit in awarding Ann the Best Answer.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.