ChatterBank3 mins ago
Is Donald Trump The American Nigel Farage?
http:// www.the guardia n.com/p olitics /2015/j ul/15/n igel-fa rage-i- share-c oncerns -with-d onald-t rump
God bless America for giving Donald and his opinions on Mexicans (bringing drugs, rape and crime to the U.S.) and John McCain, who is not a war hero apparently...coz he got captured.
Our boy Nigel is a bit of an amateur compared to Donnie, but do you see any confluence?
God bless America for giving Donald and his opinions on Mexicans (bringing drugs, rape and crime to the U.S.) and John McCain, who is not a war hero apparently...coz he got captured.
Our boy Nigel is a bit of an amateur compared to Donnie, but do you see any confluence?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by sp1814. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Svejk -- five years is a long time in politics of course but at the moment UKIP's popularity seems to be somewhat lower than in the first few months of the year. Fallout from the infighting we've seen in the party lately?
The 2017 referendum may well prove a boost to Ukip whatever the result, though -- even a no vote wouldn't be fatal if it's close enough to galvanise the supporters of leaving the EU, who would surely fell somewhat betrayed by the Conservatives and we might see something similar to what happened to the SNP when they lost the referendum. On the other hand UKIP would have to sustain that for three years rather than just a few months.
But then you were talking up UKIP's prospects in 2015 and they ended up with fewer votes and seats than even I'd expected. Come 2020, and assuming UKIP has the best of things over the next five years, I still doubt we'd see them surging in quite the same fashion as the SNP did. I'd expect 30 seats to be an optimistic target given the challenges a party whose support is not really concentrated locally faces under FPTP.
The 2017 referendum may well prove a boost to Ukip whatever the result, though -- even a no vote wouldn't be fatal if it's close enough to galvanise the supporters of leaving the EU, who would surely fell somewhat betrayed by the Conservatives and we might see something similar to what happened to the SNP when they lost the referendum. On the other hand UKIP would have to sustain that for three years rather than just a few months.
But then you were talking up UKIP's prospects in 2015 and they ended up with fewer votes and seats than even I'd expected. Come 2020, and assuming UKIP has the best of things over the next five years, I still doubt we'd see them surging in quite the same fashion as the SNP did. I'd expect 30 seats to be an optimistic target given the challenges a party whose support is not really concentrated locally faces under FPTP.
-- answer removed --
Ironically, UKIP is mostly supported by the EU Taxpayer.
http:// www.the guardia n.com/p olitics /2009/m ay/24/m ps-expe nses-uk ip-nige l-farag e
The £millions their MEPs claim keeps the Party going. Leave the EU and lose those MEPs and the party is broke .
http://
The £millions their MEPs claim keeps the Party going. Leave the EU and lose those MEPs and the party is broke .
What has Nigel Farage said that isn't perfectly true?
The Guardian chose to pick up on this;
/// Trump, who is running to be the Republican presidential candidate, attracted comparisons with Farage after causing controversy by suggesting that Mexican immigrants include rapists and that they bring drugs and crime to the US. ///
/// During the British election campaign, Farage was criticised for proposing a ban on immigrants with HIV entering the country. ///
What has proposing a ban on immigrants bringing in HIV to be treated on our overstretched NHS, got to do with Mexican immigrants include rapists bringing drugs and crime to the US?
The Guardian chose to pick up on this;
/// Trump, who is running to be the Republican presidential candidate, attracted comparisons with Farage after causing controversy by suggesting that Mexican immigrants include rapists and that they bring drugs and crime to the US. ///
/// During the British election campaign, Farage was criticised for proposing a ban on immigrants with HIV entering the country. ///
What has proposing a ban on immigrants bringing in HIV to be treated on our overstretched NHS, got to do with Mexican immigrants include rapists bringing drugs and crime to the US?
Yes, true AOG, although the difference is that Labour's "not doing well" still means well over 200 MPs, goodness knows how many local councillors and a strong power base from which to recover; while the Lib Dems were in the coalition government before crashing. They, too, have (or had) some significant voter support and may be able to rebuild yet. UKIP however have fallen back (possibly) from a handful of MEPs/ councillors and one MP, and as yet haven't quite built up concentrated support. And they came out of the 2015 Election fairly well, really. A slump for UKIP is then that much more acute because they don't have much to slump from in the first place.
All the same, I would be surprised if UKIP don't have an important role to play in the coming years.
All the same, I would be surprised if UKIP don't have an important role to play in the coming years.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.