Quizzes & Puzzles2 mins ago
Could This Be A Case Of 'don't Believe All You Read'?
57 Answers
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Hypognosis,
// If the "Asian man" is a complete fabrication, then there is no-one in a *direct* position to accuse her of race-hate speech. //
And no one is. She has not been charged with a race hate offence. She has been charged with perverting the course of justice.
Does the law *literally* allow others to take offence on the behalf of all Asians, having been impugned in this manner?
// If the "Asian man" is a complete fabrication, then there is no-one in a *direct* position to accuse her of race-hate speech. //
And no one is. She has not been charged with a race hate offence. She has been charged with perverting the course of justice.
Does the law *literally* allow others to take offence on the behalf of all Asians, having been impugned in this manner?
“Does the law *literally* allow others to take offence on the behalf of all Asians, having been impugned in this manner?”
Well, not quite “take offence”, Hypo. But consider this:
"A racist incident is any incident which is perceived to be racist by the victim or any other person."
“That the term "racist incident" must be understood to include crimes and non-crimes in policing terms. Both must be reported, recorded and investigated with equal commitment.”
These are recommendations 12 and 13 of the Macpherson report into the police handling of the death of Stephen Lawrence. So the answer to your question is probably “yes”. But as Gromit points out, this is to do with attempting to pervert the course of justice, not racially insulting behaviour.
Well, not quite “take offence”, Hypo. But consider this:
"A racist incident is any incident which is perceived to be racist by the victim or any other person."
“That the term "racist incident" must be understood to include crimes and non-crimes in policing terms. Both must be reported, recorded and investigated with equal commitment.”
These are recommendations 12 and 13 of the Macpherson report into the police handling of the death of Stephen Lawrence. So the answer to your question is probably “yes”. But as Gromit points out, this is to do with attempting to pervert the course of justice, not racially insulting behaviour.
Gromit // I reckon Primark will be more concerned with loss of revenue than reputation which can be repaired. People will have not shopped there either because they have babies, or showing solidarity with breast feeding mothers.//
Sales figures will be interesting but I don't think there will be too much damage. Primark is a popular retailer which represents decent value for money to a lot of people.
If Primark were on trial and lost then it would be a different situation. I would say that mothers with babies would not stay away at worrying levels and as more facts emerge I can't imagine a huge wave of support from breast feeding mothers either despite the FB acknowledgements.
Sales figures will be interesting but I don't think there will be too much damage. Primark is a popular retailer which represents decent value for money to a lot of people.
If Primark were on trial and lost then it would be a different situation. I would say that mothers with babies would not stay away at worrying levels and as more facts emerge I can't imagine a huge wave of support from breast feeding mothers either despite the FB acknowledgements.
// What's wrong with the names Paige and Freya //
There's nothing wrong with "Freya"
In Wagner's Ring, Wotan (or was it Loge?) promised Freya, the goddess associated with, essentially, sexuality, to the giants Fasolt and Fafner, for building Valhalla.
When they returned her, they demanded as much gold as would completely cover her. When she was covered in gold, the ends of her hair were still showing.
One presumes that "get yer tits out and rip off Primark" mum named her child Freya because she had beautiful hair, which would show from under a heap of gold.
Although it doesn't look like she's getting much gold from Primark.
There's nothing wrong with "Freya"
In Wagner's Ring, Wotan (or was it Loge?) promised Freya, the goddess associated with, essentially, sexuality, to the giants Fasolt and Fafner, for building Valhalla.
When they returned her, they demanded as much gold as would completely cover her. When she was covered in gold, the ends of her hair were still showing.
One presumes that "get yer tits out and rip off Primark" mum named her child Freya because she had beautiful hair, which would show from under a heap of gold.
Although it doesn't look like she's getting much gold from Primark.
it looks as though Primark may well come out with its reputation unstained. But it may have lost business temporarily since these allegations were first publicised, and they would have no means of getting it compensated for; I imagine this woman doesn't have enough resources to make it worth suing her (that's assuming her story to be untrue, which hasn't been proved yet). Hence my sympathy for the shop.
Thanks for answering my spin-off questions and thanks and apologies to AOG for borrowing his thread.
Meanwhile, more serious impacts on Primark's reputation are in circulation
http:// fashion .telegr aph.co. uk/arti cle/TMG 1092074 6/Shopp er-find s-label -detail ing-exp loitati ve-labo ur-in-P rimark- dress.h tml
http:// www.tel egraph. co.uk/c omment/ 1177033 5/Be-ho nest-yo u-dont- care-if -your-p retty-d ress-wa s-made- by-chil d-slave s.html? WT.mc_i d=tmgof f_pq_tw _201504 23
Meanwhile, more serious impacts on Primark's reputation are in circulation
http://
http://
Hypo,
Good links there.
I'm still not convinced though regarding damaged reputation. Granted, Primark paid a massive amount in compensation but that was a few years ago and I don't sense a reduction in footfall or lengthy decline in sales figures.
Second link very thought provoking but despite attempts to prick the consumer's conscience, it is but a pipedream...
Good links there.
I'm still not convinced though regarding damaged reputation. Granted, Primark paid a massive amount in compensation but that was a few years ago and I don't sense a reduction in footfall or lengthy decline in sales figures.
Second link very thought provoking but despite attempts to prick the consumer's conscience, it is but a pipedream...
Follow on from Hypo's link:
http:// www.mar ketingm agazine .co.uk/ article /131107 1/prima rk-trac k-17-an nual-sa les-boo st
http://