Why Always Britain?

[anotheoldgit]

http://www.itv.com/news/2015-09-10/ban-ki-moon-britain-must-show-compassionate-leadership-amid-europes-refugee-crisis/

Why is it Britain who are always criticised, it is so easy to pass the book, when UN chief Ban Ki-moon and the UN should be sorting this problem out at it's source?

[KARL]

On this one Britain is a conspicuous anachronism - Simples.

[bazwillrun]

Our global reputation as easy soft touch mugs precedes us...

[Gromit]

The man is obviously an idiot...

// "I have spoken to PM David Cameron and urged him to show strong global leadership //

..I rest my case.

[VHG]

>>> it is so easy to pass the book

I though it was "pass the buck"

http://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/pass-the-buck.html

[Gladeian]

And how many migrants are South Korea, taking which is where this posturing nonentity comes from.

[anotheoldgit]

Yes and what about the oil-rich Gulf states they have failed to resettle a SINGLE Syrian refugee.

http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/604373/Refugee-crisis-Arab-nations-fail-Syrian-refugees

[Gromit]

AOG

It is the Arabs and their evil wahabbi followers who are responsible for displacing the majority of Syrian civilians. Wrong kind of muslim you see.