Has Ab A New Ed?.

[vivandorron]

Ed....I have observed that your style of postings have altered.

Consequently, I am am being bold enough to ask....Have you really been with us since April 2002.?

Ron.

[B00]

to be fair DT, Ron did seem to have morethings he was unhappy about regarding AB than not, I did often wonder exactly what he got from the site seeing as he was so thoroughly annoyed about each and every nuance of it.

[boxtops]

It's hard to believe that ron actually audited Ed's posts, to analyse the styles of comment of the different Eds.... (well no, perhaps it's not)

[Sipowicz]

Another Ron bites the dust!

[DTCwordfan]

true B00, though he did have some amusing moments.

[Barmaid]

http://www.someecards.com/usercards/viewcard/d5a23e57b2500174fde710799bb2aec7

[ummmm]

Does anyone remember a few years back that user who only posted in Suggs not just moaning about AB but also moaning about other members, even though he never posted anywhere else. One of his names was 'prospector'

[jno]

it's Viv I feel sorry for, she's going to have a lot more Ron on her hands now

[boxtops]

before my time, ummmm!

[DTCwordfan]

lol^

[Sqad]

Barmaid.......now that is a dress.....notice the zip?...essential.

[boxtops]

sqad, are you talking about the mature dating advert....?! and why do I keep getting salwar kameez adverts on this thread, is there a middle eastern connection...?

[Sqad]

It's gone.......;-(

[Saki]

Lol @ Sipowicz, brilliant!

[AB Editor]

We're clearing out the "naughty" ads, hopefully Sqad will still find the site alluring enough to visit!

[DTCwordfan]

Now if you sign up the likes of Aubade, Chantelle, Alice Cadolle, or Fantasie, being the premium end of the lingerie market Ed, that will keep Sqad and the men happy.......

[boxtops]

Then you can't complain when we drool over Brian Cox, DT... :-)

[ladybirder]

I thought, obviously wrongly, that 'user inactive' was something you made yourself and that if carried out by the ed would be 'banned' or 'suspended'. Ooh it is difficult to understand.

[AB Editor]

"I thought, obviously wrongly, that 'user inactive' was something you made yourself and that if carried out by the ed would be 'banned' or 'suspended'. Ooh it is difficult to understand."

You're quite correct, but I can change a user status to pretty much anything. What you've stated above is the usual order of things.

[mrs.chappie]

Like a dog with a bone, or as stubborn as a mule, maybe. But a troll? Vivandorron has been a member of this site since 2006, has asked 300+ questions and posted 4,000+ replies.

Get rid of him (although I think it's a shame) if he has ****** you off sufficiently Ed, but to call him a troll is a bit much. I think you've been very harsh.

[jno]

that's fair, mrs.chappie, but I think he was a drain on editorial time, and no editor in the world likes that.

I wish he could have felt a bit less affronted sometimes. He was nice when he didn't get bees in his bonnet.