Admin Editing Posts

[naomi24]

Twice today my posts have been edited. Is this a new policy? If so, I think it should be re-examined. I for one am not happy for other people to change what I've written. That simply isn't right.

[melv16]

How many v's are there in grovelling?

[naomi24]

melv, if you mean grovelling to me, to what benefit?

[TheDevil]

Naomi24 - "No it didn’t - and no it wasn’t."

Did what you write get changed or did part of it get removed?

It's all fun and games being alluding but i think it's sinister to give off the impression that what you wrote was changed if in fact part of it (that might have broken Site Rules) was just removed.

[naomi24]

//i think it's sinister //

You do? Righto.

[dannyk13]

Spath, the part that was removed was ,in the interests of clarity,a reference to a post that had been removed.

[TheDevil]

Exactly. I thought as much.

[hereIam]

Only one 'v' melv - how come you didn't know that ?? (That's my last post on the matter).

[TheDevil]

Why are you referring to me by that word? It's not really in the spirit of AB.

shall I start calling you Merlin just because I feel like it?

[dannyk13]

Sorry TD. No harm intended.

[naomi24]

danny, no it wasn't a reference to a post that had been removed - not at all. I asked someone why they disagreed with me - and that was removed.

[TheDevil]

Now imagine if that word at the beginning of your answer was edited out because I reported it for being antagonising / hostile, would you feel it appropriate to start a thread implying what you've wrote was changed to such an extent that you feel it simply isn't right?

[TheDevil]

Naomi24 - "and that was removed."

I thought your post was edited? Maybe if you weren't so alluding you wouldn't have to keep explaining yourself.

[dannyk13]

TD,m give it a rest, there was no antagonism or hostility.

[TheDevil]

If there is from my perspective, then you've no right to tell me otherwise.

Do you not get what i'm hinting at?

[HansUrbancka]

@[email protected] fail to see that removing part of a posting can be, as you have said...",in the interests of clarity." More likely to cloud matters.

Hans.

[naomi24]

TD, Maybe if people took the trouble to read what's written instead of making it up as they go along I wouldn't have to keep explaining myself. It's simple enough.

You've described me as 'alluding' which makes no sense. Perhaps you meant 'alluring'. ;o)

[dannyk13]

Hans // More likely to cloud matters.//
So you think that referring to something that is no longer there is not likely to cloud matters?

[TheDevil]

Naomi24, alluring... sure.

[naomi24]

danny, //So you think that referring to something that is no longer there is not likely to cloud matters? //

For goodness sake! I asked someone whose post WAS THERE why she disagreed with me. Her post was subsequently removed - along with my question.

[HansUrbancka]

Danny, I regret being unable to comprehend your thoughts.

Hans.