Admin Editing Posts

[naomi24]

Twice today my posts have been edited. Is this a new policy? If so, I think it should be re-examined. I for one am not happy for other people to change what I've written. That simply isn't right.

[TheDevil]

If my post above got edited to just say

'Naomi24 - "What offending answer?"

Obviously the answer that you're saying has been edited to cause this entire issue.'


I wouldn't start a thread about it in eds blog saying that this simply isn't right

[pixie374]

TD, as you are well aware, I had a post removed for asking you a question that you were unable to answer.
Nobody is lying, but there clearly is genuine confusion sometimes, when something apparently breaks "Site Rules" but is nothing to do with what is listed there.
Maybe they need to be made clearer, as not everything removed comes under the rules. Editing, removing parts of a post "is" changing it.

[naomi24]

?

[TheDevil]

"TD, as you are well aware, I had a post removed for asking you a question that you were unable to answer."

That is nonsense. You ask'd a question, I answered it and you pretended like I hadn't, to follow up by saying "Well, seems you don't know then" after I had literally just said my answer. That is gaslighting which is abusive.

[naomi24]

The question mark was to TD. I have no idea what he's talking about.

pixie, rule-breaking isn't the issue. Nothing in my post broke any rules.

[TheDevil]

"Nothing in my post broke any rules."

The editor on page one is implying different.

[pixie374]

Mine neither, naomi. You didn't, TD. The question was removed. Neither is that "gaslighting". This is why everyone is confusing you with a previous poster... as he also felt every post that didn't directly agree with him was "antagonising and hostile". Same phrase even.

[naomi24]

No ... she isn't.

[TheDevil]

I think you're all highly paranoid and wrapped up pretty tight in your own bubbles.

You think your always right but evidently people have a different perspective.

[naomi24]

Okay.

[pixie374]

Paranoid... from someone who sees a question as "gaslighting"...?
I don't see conspiracy theories or a rant against Ed's or mods, just a question about editing.

[TheDevil]

Pixie even though you were involved in the situation we're now discussing you still don't understand. Do you?

If you ask someone a question and thye answer, to reply with something along the lines of "Evidently you don't know" even though they had just took their time ot answer your question is abusive, it's also gas lighting.

Asking someone a question isn't the issue, it's how you responded to it. See, understand now how your perception of the issue was the question, and how mine was how you ignored my answer?

[diddlydo]

If I started a thread like this it would be deleted straightaway. Different rules seem to apply to Naomi as she gets away with murder.

[TheDevil]

Exactly Diddly. I agree. If this was a thread from Jordyboy it would have been removed.

It's OK though, some of these members with a high IQ have no EQ.

[naomi24]

I'm having a popcorn moment. This is fascinating. :o)

[pixie374]

TD, your answer was "it's too obvious to bother explaining".
You were gas lighting me?

[pixie374]

Lol, naomi :-)

[naomi24]

Popcorn, pix? :o)

[pixie374]

Thanks, naomi :-)