ChatterBank7 mins ago
Unjustified Name Calling.
41 Answers
Does unjustifiably calling another User "a pro-Kremlin troll" breach the Site Rules?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by sevenOP. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.As I pointed out in the Secret Mod thread, some users of the site are given preferential treatment over others.
One describes anyone with even a slightly alternate political view to his as a 5th Columnist, Poltroon or a Marxist and does so with impunity.
It’s selective Moderation, it’s allowed to increase site traffic and thus gain revenue. Get used to it.
One describes anyone with even a slightly alternate political view to his as a 5th Columnist, Poltroon or a Marxist and does so with impunity.
It’s selective Moderation, it’s allowed to increase site traffic and thus gain revenue. Get used to it.
Fatticusinch @ 09.33:
//One describes anyone with even a slightly alternate political view to his as a 5th Columnist, Poltroon or a Marxist and does so with impunity.//
We all know who that user is. I prefer to call him Harry Boyle, the character from Wait Till Your Father Gets Home, who thought everyone was communist.
//One describes anyone with even a slightly alternate political view to his as a 5th Columnist, Poltroon or a Marxist and does so with impunity.//
We all know who that user is. I prefer to call him Harry Boyle, the character from Wait Till Your Father Gets Home, who thought everyone was communist.
not spiked ( like remifentanyl) the noun ( or er name) (*)
but surely qualified
and who will judge the qualification and whether it is just or not
( 440 useless posts in which we are all guilty , reader, later...)
Hadacard had a go at Nailit ( in front of me, you have to be quick at this) calling him, bald alcoholic. Nailit protested that he had a good head of hair for an alco....
and I thought it was better left....away it went.
Mrs Cheese - anti vaxxer was also active. She of course will protest she isnt an antivaxxer, ( all her frenz who have been vaccinated are now dead, some dead in battle some poisoned by their wives, others deposed (*) all murthered) isnt an antivaxxer but it telling the troof ( no not as she sees it, the unvarnished troof)
(*) as the secret mod boasted yesterday, she doesnt read Tostoy, she doesnt read Churchill, but yes today it is
Shakey - on AB ! (eek) for within this hollow crown which bounds the temples of the mortal kings keeps death his court.... Richard II you are quite right
oh dear dear where will all end?
- hey this is a quote from 400 y ago - who was it who was whining about hundred year old precedents in the law section yesterday? ( and I wasnt even trying)
but surely qualified
and who will judge the qualification and whether it is just or not
( 440 useless posts in which we are all guilty , reader, later...)
Hadacard had a go at Nailit ( in front of me, you have to be quick at this) calling him, bald alcoholic. Nailit protested that he had a good head of hair for an alco....
and I thought it was better left....away it went.
Mrs Cheese - anti vaxxer was also active. She of course will protest she isnt an antivaxxer, ( all her frenz who have been vaccinated are now dead, some dead in battle some poisoned by their wives, others deposed (*) all murthered) isnt an antivaxxer but it telling the troof ( no not as she sees it, the unvarnished troof)
(*) as the secret mod boasted yesterday, she doesnt read Tostoy, she doesnt read Churchill, but yes today it is
Shakey - on AB ! (eek) for within this hollow crown which bounds the temples of the mortal kings keeps death his court.... Richard II you are quite right
oh dear dear where will all end?
- hey this is a quote from 400 y ago - who was it who was whining about hundred year old precedents in the law section yesterday? ( and I wasnt even trying)
naomi24
//No, Fatticusinch, it's aimed at people who don't share your opinion and is actually very childish.//
Get it right naomi24, you never acknowledge any recorded factual evidence about the misdemeanours of the former PM, hence you scuttle off whenever it’s presented to you.
As pointed out here.
https:/ /www.th eanswer bank.co .uk/New s/Quest ion1811 301-2.h tml
//No, Fatticusinch, it's aimed at people who don't share your opinion and is actually very childish.//
Get it right naomi24, you never acknowledge any recorded factual evidence about the misdemeanours of the former PM, hence you scuttle off whenever it’s presented to you.
As pointed out here.
https:/
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.