ChatterBank13 mins ago
Gravitate
35 Answers
Look, it must be possible to identify the computer used by this nuisance and refuse him or her or postings whatever version of pseudonym used and whatever the email address. It's all very well our resolving not to answer but the fact is the offender is persistent to such a degree that he/she pushes proper questions off the page regardless, and the result is that people do not see and learn from the proper answers .That makes AB less useful to the public.So please do something. This is a community site, not a one poster dominating site.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by fredpuli47. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Yes sir.prize the problem does lie with the Editor. The power - or not, is the indication of how well run a site is and it's quite obvious that there is no one at the helm on AB.
How different to just a few years ago when just one expletive would cause major uproar and the poster concerned would be chastised and if repeated, have their account terminated. Abuse was instant dismissal and no second chance.Then, this was a great site where everyone had fun and it was used for the purpose intended. Aah, the good old days!!
How different to just a few years ago when just one expletive would cause major uproar and the poster concerned would be chastised and if repeated, have their account terminated. Abuse was instant dismissal and no second chance.Then, this was a great site where everyone had fun and it was used for the purpose intended. Aah, the good old days!!
aye jno and Cetti
and what happened to all them posters we once new once upon a long ago.
IndieSinger.
butter 1-wingnut-
fakeplastic
sashagreen- insane wally
jules001--judiewudie
graemer--artful--bernardo-(:O)
-jennymac
sammysnake--lindyloo--evertonsue
dymsjps--steve d-.tartanwiz-.guccigal-
bexbex---sasha -gemma
-funcychicken-
them were the days...(:O)
-- answer removed --
I agree Grav CAN be annoying- but any need to victimise him like this?
For all we know his questions could be genuine, just because we find 'em bizarre, i doesn't mean they're not legitimate to him.
I've found him to be largely harmless, if perhaps a bit barking (geddit?), I happen to think they are far worse members who need to be 'sorted out' before him.
For all we know his questions could be genuine, just because we find 'em bizarre, i doesn't mean they're not legitimate to him.
I've found him to be largely harmless, if perhaps a bit barking (geddit?), I happen to think they are far worse members who need to be 'sorted out' before him.
-- answer removed --