It's A Snowflake...shut Things!
News3 mins ago
... illustrator?
I remember reading somewhere that Norman Rockwell was an illustrator. He seemed á fairly good artist to me.
No best answer has yet been selected by sandyRoe. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Khandro - //
a-h// the notion of music as an art form is not relevant. //
I didn't say it was, it was an analogy, just as Ellipsis gave you a the similar analogy of an athlete.
Is that beyond your ability to comprehend? //
No, it's not, but that's becuase I know what an analogy is.
An analogy is the use of a comparison of two descriptions which are disparate, but share similarities.
"a comparison of two otherwise unlike things based on resemblance of a particular aspect. b. : resemblance in some particulars between things otherwise unlike "
Therefore, your comparison of art forms is not an anlaogy.
Of course, if you were not so keen to show off your 'knowledged', you could take the time to make sure that your point is appropriate and accurate, but you didn't, and it's not.
As usual, your insecurity leads you to patronise, and again your imagined superiority trips you up.
Perhaps you should quit while you're being - again.
Khandro - // braniac //All illustrators are artists; but not all artists are illustrators//
Agree 100%. That is precisely what I am saying and what I said at 8:30 using the analogy of musicians, and Ellipsis used with the analogy of athletes.
But for some reason no one seems to be able to get that across. //
As I pointed out earlier - ellipsis's comparison is an analogy, but yours is not, and I fully expect you stubbornly to refuse to acknowledge your error.
Moving on -
In response to braniac's post -
//All illustrators are artists; but not all artists are illustrators//
You offer -
//Agree 100%. That is precisely what I am saying and what I said at 8:30 using the analogy of musicians, and Ellipsis used with the analogy of athletes.
But for some reason no one seems to be able to get that across. //
Ane yet, yesterday at 2:07, in response to the OP question - 'What's The Difference Between An Artist And An Illustrater?", you replied - quote - "There is no difference".
Either you don't actually know what you think, or you have forgotten your view from yesterday, which is why you are directly contradicting it today, or you are simply trying to sound brighter and more informed than you actually are.
Take your time ...
//Ane yet, yesterday at 2:07, in response to the OP question - 'What's The Difference Between An Artist And An Illustrater?", you replied - quote - "There is no difference".//
Yes, because I was answering the OP, which is effectively, 'Is Norman Rockwell an artist or an illustrator?'
And there is no difference because he is an artist AND an illustrator. Just as Eric Clapton is a guitarist AND a musician.
Why can you not grasp that?
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.