Underestimate The British Farmers At...
ChatterBank1 min ago
... illustrator?
I remember reading somewhere that Norman Rockwell was an illustrator. He seemed á fairly good artist to me.
No best answer has yet been selected by sandyRoe. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Atheist - // Innocent question, and silly peevish answers. It's all words. Does it really matter, apart from providing an excuse for bickering and showing off? //
Personally, I think it does matter, because written and verbal communcation are things that are very important to me.
I don't believe I have been peevish - I have reacted to some refusal to accept a simple point of fact, coupled with sneering superiority, but that's my standard response when I receive either.
I am sure the thread is winding down, but hopefully sandy has an answer -
They are different - an illustrator is always an artist, an artist is not always an illustrator.
The monk is illustrating - as evidenced by the size of his illustrations compared to the space given to the text - it's clear which takes priority
not at all, andy. Here are some examples
https:/
https:/
https:/
There's a lot of variation from page to page (and there are thousands of pages I could have chosen), but most scholars will tell you that such manuscripts are unique in the way text and pictures create a unified ensemble. You really can't distinguish between art and illustration back then.
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.