News23 mins ago
Is 1 In 500 Really A 'very Small Number Of People'?
25 Answers
"Drugs used to treat seizures increase the risk of suicidal thoughts or behavior. LYRICA may cause suicidal thoughts or actions in a very small number of people, about 1 in 500."
The above is from a web page giving information on a drug.
The above is from a web page giving information on a drug.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by sandyRoe. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I take it for fibromyalgia to damp down pain responses. When I started getting really bad shooting pains in my limbs as a side effect of methotrexate I take for rheumatoid arthritis I was told to double it that evening then triple it a couple of days after.
I doubled it and started getting suicidal thoughts but, although I was just prescribed it by a rheumatology registrar without being told anything about it, I had read up on it a lot myself so I knew it was a potential side effect.
It was very strange, I just kept seeing ways to kill myself everywhere, knives, the oven, the bath... I was rational enough to attribute it to the drugs and just went to bed to sleep through it.
I then dropped down to 3 tablets (1.5 x original dose) for a few days then, rather tentatively, went up to 2. That went ok but have never dared going up further.
I did think of what could happen for people who weren't aware of the potential side effects or couldn't rationalise.
But it's a rare side effect and the benefit of taking it for me outweighed the side effects I read about. Similar the potential significant weight gain - I piled on weight twice, when starting then when it was increased, same as when I started mirtazapine (I wasn't told of the potential effects but I read up) and steroids. The benefit for me has outweighed it.
Many side effects are listed as precautionary and I imagine defensively to try to avoid litigation. I like to be informed but I take little notice of the rafts of potential side effects listed unless they effect me badly enough that it outweighs the benefit of taking them.
I doubled it and started getting suicidal thoughts but, although I was just prescribed it by a rheumatology registrar without being told anything about it, I had read up on it a lot myself so I knew it was a potential side effect.
It was very strange, I just kept seeing ways to kill myself everywhere, knives, the oven, the bath... I was rational enough to attribute it to the drugs and just went to bed to sleep through it.
I then dropped down to 3 tablets (1.5 x original dose) for a few days then, rather tentatively, went up to 2. That went ok but have never dared going up further.
I did think of what could happen for people who weren't aware of the potential side effects or couldn't rationalise.
But it's a rare side effect and the benefit of taking it for me outweighed the side effects I read about. Similar the potential significant weight gain - I piled on weight twice, when starting then when it was increased, same as when I started mirtazapine (I wasn't told of the potential effects but I read up) and steroids. The benefit for me has outweighed it.
Many side effects are listed as precautionary and I imagine defensively to try to avoid litigation. I like to be informed but I take little notice of the rafts of potential side effects listed unless they effect me badly enough that it outweighs the benefit of taking them.
A number can be both big and small.
And something can have the quality go both big, and small.
According to Plato, it has to be considered in context.
A mouse is small, in the context of an elephant, but big in the context of an ant.
An elephant is big, in the context of a mouse, but small in the context of a mountain.
So 1/500 is big in the context of exposing patients to a risk, to which most of us dinit haveti be exposed.
But small in the context of side-effect free treatment for 99.8% of patients.
Particularly if they will just have suicidal "thoughts", rather than automatically jumping off the first high building they encounter.
And something can have the quality go both big, and small.
According to Plato, it has to be considered in context.
A mouse is small, in the context of an elephant, but big in the context of an ant.
An elephant is big, in the context of a mouse, but small in the context of a mountain.
So 1/500 is big in the context of exposing patients to a risk, to which most of us dinit haveti be exposed.
But small in the context of side-effect free treatment for 99.8% of patients.
Particularly if they will just have suicidal "thoughts", rather than automatically jumping off the first high building they encounter.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.