ChatterBank6 mins ago
The Myth Of Using 10% Of Our Brains
51 Answers
a lot of ignorant scientist types are now claiming that we use all of our brain which is causing great discomfort in my head.
Firstly if I say I only use 10% of my brain is correct. I consciously controls parts of my body which is probably 10 % of the functions happening within the body. I personally dont use the other parts of my brain for breathing that is done automatically.
If I used all of my brain I could control cell replication having eternal life. The limitations are rather out stretched.
To be honest like anything there must be a way to hack into parts of the brains that cant be controlled.
So what could we achieve when we hack the brain?
Eternal life and....
Firstly if I say I only use 10% of my brain is correct. I consciously controls parts of my body which is probably 10 % of the functions happening within the body. I personally dont use the other parts of my brain for breathing that is done automatically.
If I used all of my brain I could control cell replication having eternal life. The limitations are rather out stretched.
To be honest like anything there must be a way to hack into parts of the brains that cant be controlled.
So what could we achieve when we hack the brain?
Eternal life and....
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by ukanonymous. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
spath fear not these closed in scientists the truth is coming soon
http:// walacea .com/ca mpaigns /lsd/
Scientists close off a box of existence, make a few numbers match and then declare they understand the physical laws of this dimension. But they do come in handy as a whole. Just individually they are useless.
http://
Scientists close off a box of existence, make a few numbers match and then declare they understand the physical laws of this dimension. But they do come in handy as a whole. Just individually they are useless.
The only thing 3 A's in science a level did for me was to make me chose something else. It's all very well having pages of useless parrot fashioned junk to prove something from first principles but it doesn't really mean anything and it just focuses on such a tiny part of reality.
It's like watching a film with ought sound. Like eating chocolate with no taste buds. Your claims of proof mean nothing. Life does not revolve around anything that science currently understands and if it carries on down the same limited path it never will.
You can code some DNA to heal someone but that does nothing for life when you don't even understand time. The laws of Newton were not a discovery they were merely understanding how things react with absolutely no idea why they react like that.
For me science is as brain dead as a person of great religion right now. Although there is a potential for science to prevail.just right now it's lacking. A lot
It's like watching a film with ought sound. Like eating chocolate with no taste buds. Your claims of proof mean nothing. Life does not revolve around anything that science currently understands and if it carries on down the same limited path it never will.
You can code some DNA to heal someone but that does nothing for life when you don't even understand time. The laws of Newton were not a discovery they were merely understanding how things react with absolutely no idea why they react like that.
For me science is as brain dead as a person of great religion right now. Although there is a potential for science to prevail.just right now it's lacking. A lot
That's the problem with stopping at A level Science, though. You barely get any of the picture, and it's just so horribly arbitrary in presentation. No wonder people can leave school thinking Science is a religion. It is not; as taking an in-depth course in the subject at university would reveal in a way that nothing at High School ever does.
That goes for all subjects, of course. Their treatment at school leaves much to be desired, although to be fair this is inevitable as the objective of school is to give a breadth to education, rather than any depth. But if your opinions of Science are based on what you saw at A level that is similar to forming an opinion of Beethoven's compositional skills having only heard "Fuer Elise".
That goes for all subjects, of course. Their treatment at school leaves much to be desired, although to be fair this is inevitable as the objective of school is to give a breadth to education, rather than any depth. But if your opinions of Science are based on what you saw at A level that is similar to forming an opinion of Beethoven's compositional skills having only heard "Fuer Elise".
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.