Quizzes & Puzzles9 mins ago
A Billion pounds + spent on the Swine flu pandemic ...that wasn't!
35 Answers
What a waste of money, how could they get it so wrong?
Just imagine what other resources this would have helped
Just imagine what other resources this would have helped
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Bobbisox. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
molly, but that wasn't happening....by July it was clear that the epidemiological forcaasts by the WHO was incorrect, but this was covered up by the scientists saying "ah! but wait until the influenza season starts in the winter....it did....and nothing happened.
The big danger would have been if the H1N1 had mutated,,,,,then big sh1t, but it never did.....that was the saving grace.
HINI was a mild disease which was treated by hitting it with a sledgehammer.
In my opinion.
The big danger would have been if the H1N1 had mutated,,,,,then big sh1t, but it never did.....that was the saving grace.
HINI was a mild disease which was treated by hitting it with a sledgehammer.
In my opinion.
I think part of the problem was the unpopularity of the then government.
Had this happened in 1997/8 when we were basking in the glow of a new and young dynamic parliament, we'd have been saying things like "well, it's always better to be safe than sorry" or "mistakes happen" or "who can really predict quite how this virus is going to behave"..........
Instead it came towards the end where we were all a little jaded and suspicious and disinclined to believe almost 'anything' that was said on the matter by the government or its' specialists.
Had this happened in 1997/8 when we were basking in the glow of a new and young dynamic parliament, we'd have been saying things like "well, it's always better to be safe than sorry" or "mistakes happen" or "who can really predict quite how this virus is going to behave"..........
Instead it came towards the end where we were all a little jaded and suspicious and disinclined to believe almost 'anything' that was said on the matter by the government or its' specialists.
-- answer removed --
The nature of vaccines means you need to quite a long lead time for development, manufacture and trial.
For the Govt to be able to stockpile a sufficiency of the specific H1N1 vaccine to cover the population, they had commission the development of the vaccine very early on in the presentation of swine flu.
At the time of that decision, all available evidence suggested that H1N1 could be an extremely nasty epidemic, with a high mortality rate, especially amongst children It is wrong to blame the Govt for ensuring we were well prepared with a working vaccine.
Despite it being, thankfully, a mild presentation, it is still the case that hundreds of thousands suffered symptoms, and over 450 people died. It could have been a lot lot worse, and where there are severe threats to the public health and wellbeing, the precautionary principle should be invoked.
I do think that the Government erred in one area of its response though. The setting up of Tamiflu hotlines, and the dispensing of tamiflu on the basis of a multiple choice questionaire was dubious.Tamiflu remains one of the few drugs we have that can help to retard the spread of a pandemic virus, and issuing it so freely gives to much opportunity for the next mutation of the flu virus to build up an immunity to the action of Tamiflu.
Other than that, I look forward to reading the report and its recommendations. I for one think that, by and large, the Government and the Health Services should be praised for their preparedness and response, rather than castigated by hindsight.
For the Govt to be able to stockpile a sufficiency of the specific H1N1 vaccine to cover the population, they had commission the development of the vaccine very early on in the presentation of swine flu.
At the time of that decision, all available evidence suggested that H1N1 could be an extremely nasty epidemic, with a high mortality rate, especially amongst children It is wrong to blame the Govt for ensuring we were well prepared with a working vaccine.
Despite it being, thankfully, a mild presentation, it is still the case that hundreds of thousands suffered symptoms, and over 450 people died. It could have been a lot lot worse, and where there are severe threats to the public health and wellbeing, the precautionary principle should be invoked.
I do think that the Government erred in one area of its response though. The setting up of Tamiflu hotlines, and the dispensing of tamiflu on the basis of a multiple choice questionaire was dubious.Tamiflu remains one of the few drugs we have that can help to retard the spread of a pandemic virus, and issuing it so freely gives to much opportunity for the next mutation of the flu virus to build up an immunity to the action of Tamiflu.
Other than that, I look forward to reading the report and its recommendations. I for one think that, by and large, the Government and the Health Services should be praised for their preparedness and response, rather than castigated by hindsight.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.