The Bloke On Who Wants To Be A...
Film, Media & TV1 min ago
On Crutches - How Can I Be Expected To Cook A Meal?
76 Answers
Currently at odds with DWP. The requirement is that you must be able independently to prepare/cook a simple meal for one using fresh ingredients (and safely). OH has been on two crutches for over a year. We have argued that she has needed my assistance to fulfil such tasks. How else is one expected to move things around the kitchen (safely) with no hands free?
Have any ABers experienced life on two crutches and managed independently to cook meals? DWP argue that they don't have to allow for carrying items around the kitchen or carrying the cooked meal to where it is to be eaten, so tough luck.
If any ABers can come up with practical and safe ideas as to cooking meals under these conditions, then we'll reluctantly concede the point, but I would welcome your views. Many thanks.
Have any ABers experienced life on two crutches and managed independently to cook meals? DWP argue that they don't have to allow for carrying items around the kitchen or carrying the cooked meal to where it is to be eaten, so tough luck.
If any ABers can come up with practical and safe ideas as to cooking meals under these conditions, then we'll reluctantly concede the point, but I would welcome your views. Many thanks.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Arrods. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Peter -what argument does he have? That his wife can't prepare his dinner for him? I suspect thousands of retired couple are in the same or similar positions -what if it was the wife that was able bodied and the husband on crutches -would the wife still be asking for 'carers allowance' because hubby couldn't make a meal?
You seem to be a trifle confused, Bednobs. Arrods is the one who doesn't like the benefits system. He's been turned down for this benefit and is now searching for grounds to challenge the decision. Of course, feel free to encourage him in this endeavour if you consider he's 'entitled' to extra money for cooking the dinner.
OK - to correct some ill-informed comment. I am effectively retired - and able-bodied. I've been doing all the cooking since OH's indisposition and have been very happy to do so.
In her PIP 'Daily Living' claim, OH has been awarded 2 points for bathing, 2 points for using a loo thingy and 2 points for needs an aid to cook. As Bednobs and Furrypussycat appreciate, OH needs 8 points to qualify for the basic award. We have argued that she needs the extra 2 points for needs assistance (as distinct from needs an aid). The fact that I have done all the cooking (quite happily as I've said) is irrelevant.
If I could mark as Best Answers those from Bednobs and Furrypussycat I would do so. It's a pity one cannot award a mark for Worst Answer; there are a couple of contenders. If it's any consolation, OH will probably withdraw the appeal because we can see the Tribunal arguing that there are ways that OH could cook etc without assistance and not having to handle hot pans etc.
In her PIP 'Daily Living' claim, OH has been awarded 2 points for bathing, 2 points for using a loo thingy and 2 points for needs an aid to cook. As Bednobs and Furrypussycat appreciate, OH needs 8 points to qualify for the basic award. We have argued that she needs the extra 2 points for needs assistance (as distinct from needs an aid). The fact that I have done all the cooking (quite happily as I've said) is irrelevant.
If I could mark as Best Answers those from Bednobs and Furrypussycat I would do so. It's a pity one cannot award a mark for Worst Answer; there are a couple of contenders. If it's any consolation, OH will probably withdraw the appeal because we can see the Tribunal arguing that there are ways that OH could cook etc without assistance and not having to handle hot pans etc.
## after each hip replacement occupational therepy unit gave me a stool so i could sit at sink or worktop to prepare meals .##
Me too mallyh,
Apart from the stool, I had a wheel trolley, a bath seat, a hand bracket fixed to my bed to help get in and out, and a foot type loop leash to swing my leg into bed.
They were very helpful.
Me too mallyh,
Apart from the stool, I had a wheel trolley, a bath seat, a hand bracket fixed to my bed to help get in and out, and a foot type loop leash to swing my leg into bed.
They were very helpful.
As Arrods points out it is a benefit to which everyone is entitled if eligible, whether working or not...how much depends on how that disability affects them, so someone in a wheelchair but who is otherwise fit and able would be eligible for the motility part. That person could then put it towards a car and perhaps use that to go to work.
I am a bit puzzled though that they would consider issuing PIP when someone is recovering as was stated earlier....I thought part of being eligible was the fact that recovery wasn't likely or undetermined, whereas this sounds like it might be temporary.
I am a bit puzzled though that they would consider issuing PIP when someone is recovering as was stated earlier....I thought part of being eligible was the fact that recovery wasn't likely or undetermined, whereas this sounds like it might be temporary.
PIP isn't payable if you make a claim after age 65 (I think) but continues if you were previously on Disability Living Allowance, assuming the disability continues.
Under PIP, for new claims the disability has to have existed for three months and must be expected to continue for a further nine months I.e. one year minimum. OH has easily exceeded this.
Under PIP, for new claims the disability has to have existed for three months and must be expected to continue for a further nine months I.e. one year minimum. OH has easily exceeded this.
Thank you Arrods for your comment. Does OH receive the mobility part as I am sure you will have been told that a Tribunal can look at the whole award which may risk her losing the mobility if she has it. Once she reaches 65 she would have to apply for Attendance Allowance which as you are aware does not have a mobility part so if she does have it then she may be better off leaving well alone and asking for a change of circumstances if her health worsens then if awarded she would remain on PIP while ever she qualified. Other than that, you could both look through the decision again assuming you have a copy of the decision maker's report and see if there is anything else that she may get the other 2 points for, ie does she need help dressing, putting tights or shoes on, cutting toe nails. It is worth looking through the whole application again to see if you can get the extra points elsewhere.
Hi Furrypussycat. Here's a bit more of the story if you can bear it! Yes, OH has been receiving a standard rate Mobility Component but this will come to an end (quite rightly) when she is more mobile, hopefully in the not too distant future.
We have already attended an Appeal Tribunal and, as well as expecting a pre-Tribunal warning that the whole of the existing award can be at risk (we were fully aware of that, but not worried because OH's current award was unquestionable) the judge said he'd seen something in the submissions to suggest that OH's current award was definitely at risk. We were gobsmacked and, encouraged by the judge, agreed to adjourn the case 'to seek some professional advice'.
We think we now know what the judge was on about. The DWP's official response to OH's appeal records that her PIP claim wasn't submitted until August 2014 and therefore she shouldn't have been receiving an award that went back to August 2013. In fact, OH's claim was submitted in August 2013. Indeed, not only is the date correctly recorded in various other sections of the paperwork, but OH's ATOS assessment was carried out in June 2014 i.e. in advance of the date the claim was alleged to have been submitted! (I know that they are 'trying' to speed up the whole process but carrying out assessments before you've even submitted a claim is miraculous.)
Thanks for your suggestions Furrypussycat. We have looked at all the additional points possible but the most we could expect was an extra 1 point for needing help to get into the shower. We were hoping for the extra 2 needed on the cooking front but have now given up.
We have already attended an Appeal Tribunal and, as well as expecting a pre-Tribunal warning that the whole of the existing award can be at risk (we were fully aware of that, but not worried because OH's current award was unquestionable) the judge said he'd seen something in the submissions to suggest that OH's current award was definitely at risk. We were gobsmacked and, encouraged by the judge, agreed to adjourn the case 'to seek some professional advice'.
We think we now know what the judge was on about. The DWP's official response to OH's appeal records that her PIP claim wasn't submitted until August 2014 and therefore she shouldn't have been receiving an award that went back to August 2013. In fact, OH's claim was submitted in August 2013. Indeed, not only is the date correctly recorded in various other sections of the paperwork, but OH's ATOS assessment was carried out in June 2014 i.e. in advance of the date the claim was alleged to have been submitted! (I know that they are 'trying' to speed up the whole process but carrying out assessments before you've even submitted a claim is miraculous.)
Thanks for your suggestions Furrypussycat. We have looked at all the additional points possible but the most we could expect was an extra 1 point for needing help to get into the shower. We were hoping for the extra 2 needed on the cooking front but have now given up.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.