Quizzes & Puzzles14 mins ago
Side Effects Of The Vaccine
38 Answers
Are there any? I know several people, all in ill health, who've had it, none of whom have reported any side effects - and yet someone has told me that everyone she knows who have had it all report bruised arms, extraordinary tiredness and other unpleasant effects. I'd be interested to hear the experiences of any ABers who have been vaccinated against Covid.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by naomi24. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I haven’t had the jab yet Naomi so can’t tell you about personal side effects.
What I can tell you is that sometimes when I have my B12 jab I get a bruise, sometimes I don’t.
Sometimes when I have a blood test I get a bruise, sometimes I don’t.
Sometimes people who have to inject insulin get a bruise, sometimes they don’t.
What I can tell you is that sometimes when I have my B12 jab I get a bruise, sometimes I don’t.
Sometimes when I have a blood test I get a bruise, sometimes I don’t.
Sometimes people who have to inject insulin get a bruise, sometimes they don’t.
I'm not trying to put anyone off, just answering the question honestly.
On the other side, my pregnant daughter, who has had and "recovered" from covid, spent all day in hospital yesterday, with chest pains and struggling to breathe. She has been sent home and seems ok now... but possibly a covid aftereffect? As that as never happened before and they couldn't find any reason.
On the other side, my pregnant daughter, who has had and "recovered" from covid, spent all day in hospital yesterday, with chest pains and struggling to breathe. She has been sent home and seems ok now... but possibly a covid aftereffect? As that as never happened before and they couldn't find any reason.
side effects - you dont ask Mrs Mopp who says that her nephew married to Mrs Foo - her whole family had to go to hospital and the doctors had never seen anything like it - you know the ones who refused to be vaccinated in the first place - them
You do a long series - ( I wrote up 5000 sedations with this view) and see what occurs. and clearly you are on your honour to report the bad ones - so you DON'T say X is safe when it isnt. Because awful things happen if someone else does the same as you and finds different (*)
This method gets over a bias called Recall Bias
Pfiser is safe. all the ones I know who arent dead, are prancing around shouting "I'm free!"
Far more serious, which I will post about later is Pfiser does not protect at the level the trials said it did. ( todays news)
Sozza Naomi there are times I take your points seriously when I know from past experience I shouldnt
Now how cd it be less effective?
well first of all you do a long series not randomised - just do them - and see if the level of protection is the same as the treatment arm of the trial. Report today says it may not be
less effective - if the population you are immunising is different to the population you tested it in. BCG - very effecive in England. Much less effective in india ( 1935 series)
long post - well done for getting down to here
for those that have
(*) excluding data ( who die etc) because it is technically not suitable, is called data pruning, and is very very naughty. You deffo have to go to bed early for that one.
You do a long series - ( I wrote up 5000 sedations with this view) and see what occurs. and clearly you are on your honour to report the bad ones - so you DON'T say X is safe when it isnt. Because awful things happen if someone else does the same as you and finds different (*)
This method gets over a bias called Recall Bias
Pfiser is safe. all the ones I know who arent dead, are prancing around shouting "I'm free!"
Far more serious, which I will post about later is Pfiser does not protect at the level the trials said it did. ( todays news)
Sozza Naomi there are times I take your points seriously when I know from past experience I shouldnt
Now how cd it be less effective?
well first of all you do a long series not randomised - just do them - and see if the level of protection is the same as the treatment arm of the trial. Report today says it may not be
less effective - if the population you are immunising is different to the population you tested it in. BCG - very effecive in England. Much less effective in india ( 1935 series)
long post - well done for getting down to here
for those that have
(*) excluding data ( who die etc) because it is technically not suitable, is called data pruning, and is very very naughty. You deffo have to go to bed early for that one.
damn I shd know the answer to that
Russia it is 1-300 which is regarded as high
govt site
Uncommon: may affect up to 1 in 100 people
enlarged lymph nodes
feeling unwell
Rare side effects: may affect up to 1 in 1,000 people
temporary one sided facial drooping
Not known (cannot be estimated from the available data)
severe allergic reaction
statistical incredible fact - if you want to say something happens less than one in 10 000
then you have to do 30 000 and have zero or one ( only )
rule of three
if you get two- that is one in 15 000, and the rate is less than one in 3000 ( rula fwee again)
so to say it is safe 1 in 100 000
you hvae to do 300 000 wiv zero or one
these you will notice are very very large numbers
Russia it is 1-300 which is regarded as high
govt site
Uncommon: may affect up to 1 in 100 people
enlarged lymph nodes
feeling unwell
Rare side effects: may affect up to 1 in 1,000 people
temporary one sided facial drooping
Not known (cannot be estimated from the available data)
severe allergic reaction
statistical incredible fact - if you want to say something happens less than one in 10 000
then you have to do 30 000 and have zero or one ( only )
rule of three
if you get two- that is one in 15 000, and the rate is less than one in 3000 ( rula fwee again)
so to say it is safe 1 in 100 000
you hvae to do 300 000 wiv zero or one
these you will notice are very very large numbers