of course I know the answer
so long as you are doing it properly ( hence the series of five) it is very slight
https://www.bmj.com/content/372/bmj.n238/rr-0
makes a bit of a meal of all this BUT fiona godlee ( editor of the BMJ silly!) has NO idea about false positive rates - so cdnt curate this letter properly
// the false negative rate would still be relatively low: 0.85% (9 missed cases in every 1000 tests).//
that is for one test - !% are wrong - for three tests if would be 1% of 1% of 1% = piffle
You are negative
ACTUALLY since you have walk ins who rate this site so whether or not TTT exclaims " WULI WULI!" I have to get it right
you should be looking at NPV
negative predictive value ( ot the test) that is - if ithe test is negative what is the chance you DON'T have the disease and that is around 100%
that is if you TEST negative you ARE negative (*)
run of three - even closer to 100%
so that is the answer - you are neg do you have covid nope
(*) testing101 has to get over the fact that
false negarive rate - - is NOT the negative predictive value
which you know med st make a helluva mess of