News1 min ago
Lateral Flow Tests
27 Answers
What's the chance of 3 negative lateral flow tests being wrong - does anyone know? I saw PP mention something about 5 tests but wasn't really sure what he meant.
Answers
LFTs are ok if done at the right time. They are accurate I think if you’re doing them to make sure you’re not carrying any infection if you are intending to visit someone or go to an event, but have no symptoms. I think that once you have any symptoms at all they don’t then pick it up so shows negative. I’ve had friends that are in jobs which require LFTs all the time....
15:33 Wed 08th Dec 2021
of course I know the answer
so long as you are doing it properly ( hence the series of five) it is very slight
https:/ /www.bm j.com/c ontent/ 372/bmj .n238/r r-0
makes a bit of a meal of all this BUT fiona godlee ( editor of the BMJ silly!) has NO idea about false positive rates - so cdnt curate this letter properly
// the false negative rate would still be relatively low: 0.85% (9 missed cases in every 1000 tests).//
that is for one test - !% are wrong - for three tests if would be 1% of 1% of 1% = piffle
You are negative
ACTUALLY since you have walk ins who rate this site so whether or not TTT exclaims " WULI WULI!" I have to get it right
you should be looking at NPV
negative predictive value ( ot the test) that is - if ithe test is negative what is the chance you DON'T have the disease and that is around 100%
that is if you TEST negative you ARE negative (*)
run of three - even closer to 100%
so that is the answer - you are neg do you have covid nope
(*) testing101 has to get over the fact that
false negarive rate - - is NOT the negative predictive value
which you know med st make a helluva mess of
so long as you are doing it properly ( hence the series of five) it is very slight
https:/
makes a bit of a meal of all this BUT fiona godlee ( editor of the BMJ silly!) has NO idea about false positive rates - so cdnt curate this letter properly
// the false negative rate would still be relatively low: 0.85% (9 missed cases in every 1000 tests).//
that is for one test - !% are wrong - for three tests if would be 1% of 1% of 1% = piffle
You are negative
ACTUALLY since you have walk ins who rate this site so whether or not TTT exclaims " WULI WULI!" I have to get it right
you should be looking at NPV
negative predictive value ( ot the test) that is - if ithe test is negative what is the chance you DON'T have the disease and that is around 100%
that is if you TEST negative you ARE negative (*)
run of three - even closer to 100%
so that is the answer - you are neg do you have covid nope
(*) testing101 has to get over the fact that
false negarive rate - - is NOT the negative predictive value
which you know med st make a helluva mess of
PP's post is a bit intelligent for me, but this is more my style.
https:/ /www.bm j.com/c ompany/ newsroo m/uk-go vernmen t-must- urgentl y-rethi nk-late ral-flo w-test- roll-ou t-warn- experts /
https:/
But then, this morning I read this https:/ /www.bb c.co.uk /news/h ealth-5 8899612
LFTs are ok if done at the right time. They are accurate I think if you’re doing them to make sure you’re not carrying any infection if you are intending to visit someone or go to an event, but have no symptoms. I think that once you have any symptoms at all they don’t then pick it up so shows negative. I’ve had friends that are in jobs which require LFTs all the time. One had a cough and tested negative every time on LFT but had a PCR which was positive. So to me if there are no symptoms LFTs are accurate but once there’s the slightest symptom only a PCR will pick it up.